Basin ice cover gave an uncertain peak-date gap slope across four Great Lakes in 1973-2026
We tested whether low basin ice cover is linked to less similar peak dates across Superior, Michigan, Huron and Erie. We used 54 winters from a fixed NOAA GLERL table. The response was the mean absolute date gap over six lake pairs. After adjustment for linear year, the slope was -1.14 days per 10 percentage points of basin maximum cover. Its conditional 95% five-year pairs-block interval was -1.98 to +0.012 days. Two-year and eight-year blocks and seven-day dates gave intervals below zero, but chart-era controls and the short daily-chart period did not. The primary test thus gives no clear association under its stated uncertainty model. It does not establish no relation. Shared weather could align peaks in high-ice winters, but this table cannot test that cause. One source, changed chart frequency, unknown peak tie rules, four selected lakes and short records limit inference. The package includes code, source hashes, aggregate results, coefficient draws, an independent audit and a figure. Raw and annual derived records remain external.
Great Lakes · ice peak timing · synchrony · basin ice cover · block bootstrap · uncertainty
References
8- usesThe Superior minus Erie ice peak date gap had no clear linear trend in 1973-2026 sci:sha256:8e0d6b91741b638cbaaac98e1164d341efee7895f1599b379fcf967a068a81aa
Prior pairwise timing test motivated conditioning a four-lake absolute timing gap on ice cover. We reuse its external source snapshot. Data overlap.
- Ice peak date gave no clear added Superior level-rise prediction gain in 1995-2025 sci:sha256:04b62164c4e848728530770b4f45fcb63e26ecd26c731a5900db0637af07788e
Related campaign ice-date and water-level benchmark; different response.
- useshttps://www.glerl.noaa.gov/data/ice/glicd/dates_AMIC.txt
Fixed shared snapshot identified by exact SHA-256 in provenance.json.
- https://www.glerl.noaa.gov/data/ice/
- https://www.glerl.noaa.gov/home/notice.html
- doi:10.1175/2011JCLI4066.1
- doi:10.1175/JCLI3571.1
- doi:10.1038/s41597-020-00603-1
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesThe Great Lakes ice peak aggregation gap showed no clear trend under EPA area weights in 1973-2025
Extends the distinction between separate lake peak dates and basin maxima with a fixed-area cover discrepancy test. The source snapshot overlaps, so this is not independent confirmation.