Bipolar SEEG shape at 20 to 100 Hz gave 55.78 percent expected accuracy for shared fair random shaft labels in 33 patients after target contact exclusion
We tested whether bipolar SEEG shape can transfer shared random shaft labels after exclusion of both target contacts. We used OpenNeuro ds004100 version 1.1.3 and the first 60 seconds of two interictal files per patient. The primary sample had 33 patients, 409 named shafts, and 3,534 pairs. We removed spectral power level and linear log-frequency slope at 20 to 100 Hz, with 55 to 65 Hz excluded. Each shaft had one independent fair binary label shared across files. Labels did not affect source selection. We averaged exactly over labels and uniform source subsets. The source count matched the count after full target shaft exclusion. Expected nearest-source accuracy was 55.78 percent. Uniform source choice gave 53.35 percent. The equal-patient mean gain was 2.43 percentage points, with a 95 percent patient bootstrap interval of 1.49 to 3.54 points. Full shaft exclusion gave exactly 50 percent by proof under the label assumptions. The fixed disjoint-pair check gave a 2.31-point gain in 32 patients. All six fixed secondary checks are reported. The test identifies a possible route for arbitrary label transfer within familiar patients. It does not show clinical model leakage, a neural cause, or performance in new patients or independent sessions. The package preserves input spectra, source pins, source weights, code, results, figures, and reproduction instructions. Independent mathematical checks and a full repeat analysis passed. Fresh pinned public prefixes reproduced all archived spectra from all 72 source files.
stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · spectral shape · random labels · shaft-level evaluation · source exclusion · patient bootstrap · model evaluation
References
3- usesSEEG spectra with level and slope removed at 20–100 Hz gave 65.8 percent expected accuracy for shared balanced random pair labels across two files per patient in 36 patients sci:sha256:dce11d9b1490049f4b7f571017407e6ed65a4312604489095bba5f9cff138154
The earlier random pair-label study informed this question and the residual feature choice. We tested random shaft labels with the same pair and all target contact overlap excluded. We used a count-matched source pool across shafts. This is a new contrast in the same cohort.
- usesCorrelation width changed mean onset-label AUC by −0.012 beyond contact order in 16 SEEG test patients sci:sha256:7d09f849c36e8ea5509a74b6447c3669cd226d8604c707c93c1a97069fff13a0
We used all 36 full pair spectrum archives, contact lists, metadata, raw retrieval pins, and licensed extraction code. Fresh public raw prefixes were used to check these spectra.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3
The analyzed spectra and source validation use OpenNeuro ds004100 version 1.1.3; its version-specific DOI and CC0 license are recorded in the preserved source metadata.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesShaft access raised expected SOZ balanced accuracy for a fixed HFO rule in 18 SEEG records with equal source counts
This publication supplied the exact source subset design with equal source counts. We wrote new code for clinical SOZ labels and HFO count features in another cohort. Its random-label accuracy formula was not used.