Later response windows gave lower mean Brier error at both fixed rest positions in eight SEEG recordings with three DPSS tapers
We tested whether moving a 250-sample response window closer to a recorded key press changed reading error when rest position stayed fixed. We used public OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2 data from eight people. The readers used eight bipolar pairs, 13–30 Hz and 70–110 Hz power, three DPSS tapers, early training trials, and 674 later test trials. We crossed first and last response halves with first and last rest halves. Mean Brier error fell by 0.029637 with the first rest half fixed and by 0.038308 with the last rest half fixed. The primary response change averaged across rest positions was −0.033973. Its descriptive 95 percent person bootstrap interval was −0.061771 to −0.008354. The exact two-sided sign-flip reference was p = 0.05469. Error fell in six people and rose in two. Fixed Hann and single-band checks kept the mean direction. The joint-position mean change reproduced the parent result. A post hoc timing audit showed that cue position also changed. The evidence concerns offline task state in a reused clinical cohort. It cannot isolate motor preparation or establish live reading delay or stimulation benefit. The package preserves exact digital inputs, source versions and range hashes, every model and prediction, code, four figures, and repeat instructions. Independent checks covered 192 fits and 32 feature arrays. Fresh retrieval matched selected samples in 16 source ranges. An exact replay matched 28 output files and 1,428 arrays.
stereoelectroencephalography · brain-computer interfaces · window position · Brier error · DPSS · logistic regression · OpenNeuro
References
5- The last 250 samples gave mixed Brier error changes against 500 samples in eight SEEG task state readers with three tapers sci:sha256:db0a649b736a8d86e3c000cb147a3812525c0a0cee4508122cabf769cf444934
[Legacy relation: reproduces] The first-half and last-half two-band feature arrays and later test logits matched 32 person-method comparisons for DPSS and Hann. The joint-position mean Brier change matched −0.037887 for three DPSS tapers. This is a numerical repeat on the same cohort.
- usesThe last 250 samples gave mixed Brier error changes against 500 samples in eight SEEG task state readers with three tapers sci:sha256:db0a649b736a8d86e3c000cb147a3812525c0a0cee4508122cabf769cf444934
This work supplied the exact 500-sample digital inputs, selection records, source metadata, EDF headers, pinned range hashes, and power, logistic, and retrieval helpers. Its joint first-versus-last window comparison motivated the new separate response and rest comparison. The same people and later test trials are reused.
- usesEight SEEG pairs classify pre-response and rest windows at 70.7% mean balanced accuracy in later trials from eight recordings sci:sha256:c74068384c7c056974c8568aab987cf5a8eee9979a622c22efa1b67a911e77fd
This work defined the inherited trial eligibility, offline voltage screen, early-trial pair ranks, selected eight bipolar pairs, task-state labels, and chronological train and test split. Those choices stayed fixed in the new window-position comparison.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2
The publication used the exact dataset release recorded in its source metadata and preserved byte-range recipe.
- doi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.