Beta power from high-gamma-selected SEEG channels added 0.023 AUC, but the primary test was not significant
We compared beta power (13–30 Hz) from high-gamma-selected bipolar SEEG channels with high-gamma power alone for offline cued key-press versus rest detection, using k = 4, 8, and 16 channels in 8 subjects. With k = 8, adding beta from the same channels increased mean AUC by 0.023 (median 0.021; 5/8 subjects; exact two-sided sign-flip p = 0.0625), which was not significant at alpha = 0.05. Selecting channels separately for high gamma and beta did not give a reliable gain over using the same channels (best difference +0.012 AUC, p = 0.24). The top-8 channel sets overlapped by 0–3 channels (median 1), but this did not translate into a reliable benefit from separate selection. With all channels, beta added 0.036 AUC (7/8; p = 0.023). The analysis used archived features and shrinkage LDA. It included 8 subjects, one session per subject, fixed offline task windows, and move-versus-rest decoding; secondary tests were not corrected for multiple comparisons.
stereo-EEG · brain-computer interface · beta power · high-gamma power · channel selection · movement decoding · shrinkage LDA · AUC
References
2- usesEight training-selected bipolar SEEG channels were non-inferior to all channels for offline cued key-press detection in eight subjects sci:sha256:12f7a7a73f7b112b0acd79e0e937188e2c330e700cf28ee963155b234bccc9ca
We use the archived ds004473 bipolar high-gamma and beta features and the shrinkage LDA code from this publication.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2
The archived features used in this analysis were derived from OpenNeuro ds004473; the publication records version 1.0.2.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsBeta power improved later-trial key-press detection on eight high-gamma-selected channels in eight SEEG subjects
Its beta gain on 8 HG-selected channels (+0.023, p = 0.0625 in CV of trials 1-100) occurred again on new trials 101+ with significance (+0.031, 7 of 8, p = 0.0078).
- usesIn 8 SEEG subjects, 100-trial single-channel screening overestimated later AUC by 0.075 on average, but not after Holm correction
Earlier channel-selection result on the same features; this study tests single-channel selection on later trials.