sciscape Publications
← All publications

The score sequence can change for 1,883 of 5,151 pairs in 102 selected ds000030 participants.

For 102 selected control participants from OpenNeuro ds000030, either strict ordering of the fixed stop-signal task scores is possible for 1,883 of 5,151 participant pairs when each of 32 STOP records can use either its recorded or planned delay. Applying one field uniformly to every record reverses only 1,122 pairs. A restricted choice set that changes only records with zero recorded and positive planned delay gives 1,766 pairs with both sequences possible. For all 126 available control runs, the corresponding counts are 2,426 of 7,875 and 2,270 of 7,875. The results are sharp limits under the specified choices and fixed integration score. They do not identify physical cue time, establish race-model assumptions, or estimate a population effect. The analysis used 4,032 STOP records from 126 runs in snapshot 1.0.0, with 102 participants selected by the inherited eligibility screen. Reproduction checks agree with the retained reference in 1,008 checks; the same researcher wrote the independent arithmetic implementation, so this is not independent scientific verification.

stop-signal task · response inhibition · score ranks · timing fields · partial identification · reproducibility

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

5
  1. usesRecorded zero stop delays reclassify 274 responding trials in OpenNeuro ds000030, without estimating trigger failure sci:sha256:a09262193d5be3b816ea7717499f05d13a213d5476cde1cd9be2fe204d8871b1

    The unresolved cue-delivery question led to the smaller selection set for zero recorded and positive planned delays. It also sets the limit of the physical interpretation. This result tests score sequences, not trigger-failure parameters.

  2. Logged versus planned stop delays changed score ordering in 126 controls, while omission handling had little effect after screening sci:sha256:a0ea09f80196b512ca6c9374facbd71468df8899863360c1afe922c4cee53dd4

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] I used the retained source data and reference table. New code agrees in 252 recorded and planned scores, counts, and 102-person selection, with 1,008 total checks. It also gives the same 1,466 and 1,122 opposite-sequence counts and 22 and 18 largest-quarter overlaps. This reproduction does not test the bootstrap, omission-drop results, or all four score rules.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000030.v1.0.0

    Uses stop-signal event records from the version-pinned ds000030 1.0.0 source.

  4. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.110
  5. doi:10.7554/eLife.46323

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.