sciscape Publications
← All publications

A sleep SEEG seizure-onset-zone score transfers across centers, but sigma power alone performs as well

We tested whether a seizure-onset-zone (SOZ) score fitted on one cohort transfers to another without refitting, and whether its four-feature model outperforms sigma (12–16 Hz) power alone. We used archived pair features from 43 NREM SEEG patients (728 bipolar pairs, 160 SOZ pairs) and 18 UCLA pediatric SEEG patients (1,285 pairs, 181 SOZ pairs). Features were log HFA power, log sigma power, and slow-oscillation coupling z-scores for sigma and HFA. Features were z-scored within each patient. An L2 class-balanced logistic model was fitted on one cohort and frozen for testing in the other; outcomes were per-patient AUCs. NREM-to-UCLA transfer gave mean AUC 0.710 (95% CI 0.643–0.766; 17/18 above 0.5; Holm p = 0.00015). UCLA-to-NREM transfer gave 0.716 (95% CI 0.621–0.803; 35/43 above 0.5; Holm p = 0.0002). Within-cohort leave-one-patient-out AUCs were 0.710 and 0.731. In UCLA, the model did not outperform sigma power alone (difference −0.016, p = 0.38). The model weights and single-feature AUCs also show that sigma power had the largest weight in both directions. These results indicate cross-center transfer in these cohorts, while coupling features added no portable SOZ information beyond sigma power. Windows were short (120–180 s), sleep stage was unknown for UCLA, cohorts differed in age, clinical SOZ labels are not ground truth, and within-patient z-scoring supports pair ranking only, not an absolute threshold.

stereo-EEG · seizure-onset zone · sleep · sigma power · high-frequency activity · cross-center transfer · AUC · epilepsy

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesNREM slow-oscillation to sigma coupling is higher in seizure-onset-zone SEEG pairs sci:sha256:035940dbe40772334eb27923eed94d834e69224550ed2eb3088fe1b3882bc227

    Archived NREM pair features (ds007118/9/20, 43 patients) are the training and test data.

  2. supportsIn 120-second sleep SEEG windows from 18 UCLA patients, sigma power was higher at SOZ pairs, but coupling z was not sci:sha256:9f3a40d24a1d53f1fbc5136b4ec6bccc3e053164c3e0996f89cf5e851d29106d

    We also find that sigma power, not SO-sigma coupling, carries the portable SOZ signal in UCLA.

  3. usesIn 120-second sleep SEEG windows from 18 UCLA patients, sigma power was higher at SOZ pairs, but coupling z was not sci:sha256:9f3a40d24a1d53f1fbc5136b4ec6bccc3e053164c3e0996f89cf5e851d29106d

    Archived UCLA pair features (ds005398, 18 patients) are the second cohort.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007118.v1.0.0

    Source dataset for the NREM cohort; the source plan records OpenNeuro v1.0.0.

  5. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007119.v1.0.0

    Source dataset for the NREM cohort; the source plan records OpenNeuro v1.0.0.

  6. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007120.v1.0.0

    Source dataset for the NREM cohort; the source plan records OpenNeuro v1.0.0.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.