SPHEREx QR2 detects the 0.75–5 µm excess of 47 of 78 clean MO26 white dwarfs with G < 17, and of all 22 with a WISE-predicted S ≥ 10; background sources cause the 2 excesses in 56 clean controls
We used SPHEREx Quick Release 2 spectral images (0.75–5.0 µm, 2025–2026) to test the infrared excesses in the list of Murillo-Ojeda et al. (2026, MO26) of white dwarfs within 100 pc. We did forced PSF photometry at the Gaia DR3 position, and we fitted the Gaia neighbours at the same time. We divided the flux by a Montreal photosphere model, and we calibrated the ratio with 30 clean DA controls. The controls are 100 random white dwarfs (G < 17) from the Gaia 100 pc catalogue that are not in MO26. Version 2 analyses 289 of the 293 targets with G < 17. It adds a pre-registered sensitivity test and a post-hoc blend check. For targets without a blend or PSF problem, SPHEREx finds an excess (S_max ≥ 5) in 47 of 78 MO26 white dwarfs (29 of 36 at G < 16.1, 18 of 42 at G ≥ 16.1) and in 2 of 56 controls. For each target, we calculated the SPHEREx significance that the WISE excess predicts (S_pred). All 22 targets with S_pred ≥ 10 have S_max ≥ 5 (median S_max/S_pred 1.08). All 15 targets with no excess have S_pred ≤ 3.2. Thus, SPHEREx does not refute any MO26 excess, but it cannot test most of the faint excesses. Background sources cause the two control excesses: a red source 1.8 arcsec from CBS 204 (Spitzer IRAC, Legacy Surveys) and a galaxy 6 arcsec from GALEX 2668675296612320268 (Legacy Surveys DR10, AllWISE position). A blend check with CatWISE2020, Legacy Surveys DR10, Pan-STARRS1 and VHS passes 40 of the 47 MO26 excesses. It finds a galaxy near 5 of them, for example Ton S 193 (as Farihi et al. 2010 found) and 2MASS J15500449+2200356 (S_max 23.3). Five excesses with no reference other than MO26 pass the blend check: L 454-9, L 221-49, SDSS J172945.16+020818.4, HS 0507+0434A and G 84-26. A blackbody fits better than a cool companion for 41 of the 47 excess spectra. For 33 of them, a companion is not necessary (median blackbody temperature 1159 K). The pre-registered comparison of the 3.4 µm flux with WISE finds a change in 2 targets. WD J2100+2122 is 40 % fainter than in 2024, after its 2023 outburst. The change of 2MASS J15500449+2200356 comes from the galaxy blend. WD 0145+234 is 22 % above AllWISE. Limitations: the SPHEREx pixels are 6.2 arcsec, and the blend check cannot find sources closer than about 2 arcsec. The QR2 calibration can change. The blend check and some rules are post hoc. We give the code, the photometry, the catalogue replies and the reproduction steps.
white dwarfs · infrared excess · debris disks · SPHEREx · WISE · NEOWISE · Spitzer IRAC · forced PSF photometry · false positives · source blending · mid-infrared variability · planetary debris · Gaia DR3 · CBS 204 · WD J2100+2122 · LAWD 84 · WD 0145+234 · 100 pc sample · sensitivity test · Legacy Surveys
References
13- usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557709
MO26 list of white dwarfs with infrared excess (reliable and tentative groups); we test all 289 targets with G < 17 with SPHEREx.
- usesdoi:10.26093/cds/vizier/bc-p3/lcgi
VizieR catalogue J/A+A/707/A268 of MO26: the target list and the Refs column (literature status).
- usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/stac3382
Gaia 100 pc white dwarf catalogue (JE23): the control sample, Teff and log g.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb3fc
WISE infrared excess survey of Xu et al. 2020, used as a cross-check.
- supportsdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1354
Lai et al. 2021 found that background sources cause some WISE excesses of white dwarfs. Our two control excesses (CBS 204, GALEX 2668675296612320268) and five galaxy blends in the MO26 excess targets are new cases of this problem.
- usesdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2609.34868
NEOWISE disk variability (Noor et al. 2026), including the 2023 outburst of WD J2100+2122; SPHEREx W1 in 2025-2026 is 40 % below the 2024 NEOWISE flux.
- usesdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.15823
SPHEREx image and spectrophotometry pipeline (QR2 images, PSF model).
- supportsWD 0145+234 had a higher mean flux at 3.4 micrometers in three 2023–2024 visits than in eight 2014–2018 visits sci:sha256:b08aee5fad66eef89cc285c0bb27f3c13a8212642043299a0773831b1275d127
SPHEREx W1 of WD 0145+234 in 2025-2026 is 22 % above AllWISE (S 4.2) and 36 % above CatWISE, but only 6.6 % above the last NEOWISE year. This agrees with the higher W1 flux in 2023-2024 than in 2014-2018 in this publication.
- supportsdoi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab53ed
Wang et al. 2019 found the 2018 infrared outburst of WD 0145+234; the SPHEREx W1 flux in 2025-2026 is still 22 % above AllWISE.
- G29-38 has lower W1 and W2 flux in 2022–2023 than in 2014–2015 under the tested calibration sci:sha256:b58f8558bc0aa65a78da7e0ac83e2c44d9845784744349837bf270de245755a3
G 29-38 (ZZ Psc) WISE variability; SPHEREx W1 is 4.8 % below AllWISE and 3.5 % below the last NEOWISE year, not significant with our error model.
- The 2020–2024 mean GD 56 flux exceeds a 2014–2019 inverse-time forecast that approaches the stellar flux sci:sha256:c4a4b60027b2de38129ebd631ac19a8faee4d06561c1dede5e71223e08b06503
GD 56 WISE variability; SPHEREx W1 is 11 % below CatWISE (S -0.7) and 7.2 % above the last NEOWISE year (S 1.9).
- supersedesSPHEREx 0.75–5 µm photometry confirms the infrared excess of 28 of 34 clean MO26 white dwarfs with G = 12.3–16.1; the one excess in 32 clean controls is a blend with a red source 1.8″ away sci:sha256:c56d7cf775ebf3efc2963adbd294f9a69bc7fa2ace3f8846df312068b3e6d2fb
Version 1 of this work (145 targets, G 12.3-16.1). Version 2 analyses all 289 targets with G < 17 with the same code (regression test passes), and adds a pre-registered sensitivity test, a post-hoc blend check and a second control check.
- supportsdoi:10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1386
Farihi et al. 2010 found a galaxy about 4.4 arcsec from Ton S 193 in Spitzer IRAC images. Our blend check finds this galaxy 4.21 arcsec away in Legacy Surveys DR10 and CatWISE; it causes most of the SPHEREx and AllWISE excess.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesSPHEREx QR2 does not establish a red excess at TYC 9279-457-1 in 2025–2026 when ten field stars set the calibration
We reuse its MIT spxphot.py code without change to extract QR2 pixels and supplied PSFs. New code refits the saved pixels and compares the target to ten field stars.
- usesAn 11-star calibration gives 0.9–1.8% flux offsets for TYC 8241-2652-1 at 4.2–5.0 µm in three SPHEREx QR2 periods in 2025–2026
We include the unchanged MIT spxphot.py range reader, with author notice and source hash. Our wrapper adds current warning bits at run time.