A 25 ms shaft rule gave 69.59% mean HFO list agreement versus 69.62% with equal-count random removal in 135 sleep SEEG records from seven patients
We tested a timing removal rule for high frequency oscillation (HFO) lists in public SEEG sleep data. The source was OpenNeuro ds003498 version 1.1.1. Seven patients supplied 135 records of 300 seconds each. The rule removed an overlap-HFO mark if another shaft had an onset within 25 ms. It removed 24.00 percent of pooled marks. Lists used ceil(0.20 times the pair count), with fractional membership at ties. Each patient had equal weight. The comparator chose uniform random subsets with the same retained count in each record. It used 50000 joint draws. Mean agreement between distinct records was 69.59 percent for the shaft rule and 69.62 percent for random removal. The difference was -0.036 percentage points. Four patient differences were positive and three were negative. The exploratory 95 percent patient interval was -3.769 to +3.899 points. The sign-flip p value was 1.0 under independent patients and null sign symmetry. This near-zero mean does not prove equal population performance. All six fixed checks are reported. The package provides source tables, hashes, code, a count control, every filter decision, results, and reproduction instructions. Independent calculations passed. All 18 numerical files matched an offline repeat. The study tests released marks, not clinical accuracy or artifact identity.
high frequency oscillations · stereoelectroencephalography · epilepsy · event detection · list agreement · repeatability · random removal · shaft timing
References
8- usesCombined HFO marks had excess onset coincidence within 25 ms across shafts in eight SEEG patients under 30 second block controls sci:sha256:c3f4652b050bf8cfd439f8aa9630a1e8e0824773f6400a6c33facaf2dc2144ec
This study of onset timing in the same cohort informed the fixed 25 ms radius. Its scores were not calculation inputs. The new question tests list agreement after timing removal, rather than excess coincidence under time shifts.
- Ripple rate lists from 60 seconds had 13.7 percentage points lower mean agreement with overlap-HFO lists from other records in seven SEEG patients, with equal patient weights sci:sha256:b2c6a4549dfc5956762ab9f09906d217c67ebed68bbb98e431f23c3c01343ff2
[Legacy relation: reproduces] The unfiltered full-record overlap-HFO list benchmark was 70.59 percent with equal patient weights. It matched the 300-second benchmark in this archive. This was a calculation check using the same cohort and source files.
- usesRipple rate lists from 60 seconds had 13.7 percentage points lower mean agreement with overlap-HFO lists from other records in seven SEEG patients, with equal patient weights sci:sha256:b2c6a4549dfc5956762ab9f09906d217c67ebed68bbb98e431f23c3c01343ff2
We fetched this archive and reused its pinned source subset, source reader, contact maps, and retrieval code. Prior score tables were not analysis inputs. We added a timing removal test and a random removal control with the same mark count.
- usessci:sha256:a22be20f9664505ea33080cefb407ff7b6665b5b75e6cc0193ba4ef160713581 not known to Sciscape
The source reader originated in this publication and reached this study through archive 47748414-a49b-43d3-bb55-e93caa8d408a. We reused its record audit and fixed mesial pair rules.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003498.v1.1.1
The analysis used the pinned OpenNeuro ds003498 version 1.1.1 release.
- usesdoi:10.6080/K06Q1VD5
The release identifies CRCNS iEEG-1 as the original source dataset; this source is cited with the OpenNeuro release.
- doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13064-1
- doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.07.016
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.