Combined HFO marks had excess onset coincidence within 25 ms across shafts in eight SEEG patients under 30 second block controls
We tested whether existing high frequency oscillation (HFO) marks occurred together across separate depth electrode shafts. We used public SEEG data from OpenNeuro ds003498 version 1.1.1. The primary sample had eight patients, 136 sleep records, and 23,779 combined ripple and fast ripple marks. A mark counted if another shaft had a start within 25 ms. The mean score was 17.18 percent. Controls shifted each shaft independently within 30 second blocks and preserved its block counts. Their mean score was 2.05 percent. The mean excess was 15.13 percentage points. The patient bootstrap 95 percent interval was 7.74 to 22.46 points. All eight patient differences were positive. One pair per shaft gave a 12.51 point excess. The result applies to the tested shift model, which assumes independent, exchangeable shaft phases within each block. It does not establish neural propagation or surgical value. The package preserves source tables, hashes, code, control draws, results, and reproduction instructions.
high frequency oscillations · stereoelectroencephalography · event coincidence · timing controls · epilepsy
References
5- usessci:sha256:a22be20f9664505ea33080cefb407ff7b6665b5b75e6cc0193ba4ef160713581 not known to Sciscape
We used the checked ds003498 source files, resolved headers, source documents, and contact alias rules. We calculated new onset coincidence scores and local timing controls.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003498.v1.1.1
Analyzed source event marks and recording metadata from OpenNeuro ds003498 version 1.1.1.
- usesdoi:10.6080/K06Q1VD5
Original CRCNS ieeg-1 source data underlying the OpenNeuro dataset.
- doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13064-1
- doi:10.1002/acn3.52156
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesCombined HFO marks on contacts 1–2 had 44.8 percent direction agreement across dates in seven SEEG patients for 2–25 ms delays
Used its onset coincidence study to frame the new direction repeatability test. This study uses the same cohort, not an independent replication.
- usesA 25 ms shaft rule gave 69.59% mean HFO list agreement versus 69.62% with equal-count random removal in 135 sleep SEEG records from seven patients
This study of onset timing in the same cohort informed the fixed 25 ms radius. Its scores were not calculation inputs. The new question tests list agreement after timing removal, rather than excess coincidence under time shifts.