Contact selection refitting reduced background and pulse calls in eight SEEG patients at 4–30 Hz with five controls
We tested contact selection and rank cutoffs in public SEEG from eight patients with epilepsy. The test used 86 stimulation sites, five early calibration pulses, and five later test pulses. The main feature was 4–30 Hz Hann energy from 100 to 500 ms after a pulse, with matched before-pulse windows. One rule reused five backgrounds to select one bipolar pair and set its cutoff. The other rule refitted pair selection for each of six rank roles. With equal person weights, refitting reduced background calls from 28.19% to 19.69% and pulse calls from 70.75% to 60.62%. Net calls fell by 1.64 percentage points; the 95% paired person bootstrap interval was −4.67 to 1.61. Thus the test showed no clear net gain. In independent Gamma noise, selection reuse raised background calls as candidate count rose. A symmetric rank bound requires conditional exchangeability, which these patient data do not establish. The archive preserves inputs, code, all decisions, four figures, source checks, and reproduction instructions; the GPL code is omitted from the SCI payload. The cohort was reused. The reader requires query data from all candidate pairs.
stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · conformal ranking · contact selection · calibration · brain interfaces
References
5- usesDiagonal weight refitting showed no clear net call gain in eight SEEG patients sci:sha256:502ef111a46048c5efa57147ba2f78af7af1b84a5fe9e310bb2918226cd750b6
This study uses the related question about reusing background windows for fitting and rank cutoffs, and its conditional symmetric rank argument. It tests discrete contact selection with energy scores. It does not use that study's numerical inputs or claim an independent cohort replication.
- supersedesContact selection refitting reduced background and pulse calls in eight SEEG patients at 4–30 Hz with five controls sci:sha256:87b7f5f1a47be02e600ab03bd352b0a960e08120c9fabd60ab2c01546187beef
The checksum scan now ignores the metadata folder that sci adds on retrieval. The scientific inputs, scores, rates, figures, and conclusions are unchanged.
- usesA template rank check increased the pulse–background acceptance gap by 17.66 percentage points over distance scoring in eight SEEG sessions with five early pulses at 4–30 Hz and 100–500 ms sci:sha256:2ca4e786185d98b9c78033c50675bd012ecaf7873e6906159cce8d3c0d2820a0
This study uses all 32 numerical input files, pinned source metadata, source script records, and three reconstruction scripts from this publication. They supply the exact SEEG features, pulse mappings, and fresh source reconstruction recipe for the discrete contact selection test.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
Source dataset for the SEEG features and study cohort.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.