Richness at 200 counted birds gave no repeated ozone link in US surveys in 1995-2024
We tested whether previous-season ozone was linked to bird richness after count standardization. We rebuilt species counts from the USGS 2025 Breeding Bird Survey release and joined a published ozone and weather panel. The pooled model used 25,257 accepted surveys on 1,970 routes. We computed expected richness in a random sample of 200 identified birds. Models controlled for route-observer and state-year effects, seasonal weather, current ozone, and survey conditions. Four East and West, early and late estimates ranged from -0.433 to +0.047 species per +10 ppb prior-season ozone. All four intervals included zero after correction for four tests. The pooled slope was -0.252, with a 95 percent interval of -0.473 to -0.030. It weakened with route trends. Thus, a repeated negative link was not established. This does not show that ozone is safe. Rarefaction changes the target measure and does not correct species-specific detection. Selected roadside routes, coarse exposures, missing controls, and few western state clusters limit inference. The package has code, source hashes, exact model inputs, numerical checks, results, and a figure.
ozone · rarefaction · bird richness · weather controls · observation bias · regional replication · null result
References
9- usesGround-level ozone had no robust association with bird counts on 2,155 US Breeding Bird Survey routes from 1995 to 2024 in fixed-effects models with observer control sci:sha256:2603c41c0fe979d3cf70d08c3bdfb1b052386c2cee04f2e9e054d5c5fa10d6a2
We reuse its verified ozone and weather panel and source retrieval code.
- usesBird-count adjustment did not establish a repeated ozone and richness link in US surveys in 1995-2024 sci:sha256:ff5ba2742981127c0ae6a46b4b16700a520bd6ce8956898990a79abf509903c4
We adapt its fixed-effect and cluster-error method. It tested regression count adjustment, not rarefaction.
- reviewsStandardization to 50 counted birds reduced negative survey-end temperature slopes in US taxon richness in 1985-2024 sci:sha256:d8ff7bce4b858cb65a42eacc344bfd4146edd46f59cc5f93847e2816cad2ccf0
Prior campaign rarefaction test concerned within-survey weather contrasts, not whole-route ozone.
- doi:10.1073/pnas.2013568117
- usesdoi:10.1093/jpe/rtr044
- doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x
- usesdoi:10.5066/P14SNUV4
- useshttps://aqs.epa.gov/aqsweb/airdata/download_files.html
- useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/monitoring-content/data/us/climdiv/monthly/current/
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesPrior ozone and warmth gave no clear repeated rise in bird count concentration in four US samples in 1995-2024
Reuse its exact exposure panel, species inclusion rule and model code. Test count concentration as a distinct outcome on overlapping records.
- usesPrior-season warmth gave no clear ozone interaction in recorded US bird concentration in 1995-2024
We adapt its raw species-count builder for a different community measure. These records overlap.