Standardization to 50 counted birds reduced negative survey-end temperature slopes in US taxon richness in 1985-2024
We tested whether a published bird weather pattern remained after count standardization. We used the fixed USGS Breeding Bird Survey 2025 release. We compared the first and last ten stops in 57,171 surveys from Canada and the US in two periods, 1985-2004 and 2005-2024. We held route-observer and state-year effects and survey conditions fixed. In the US, raw last-minus-first richness slopes were -0.288 and -0.297 taxa per 5 C warmer survey end. Expected richness at 50 counted birds gave slopes of -0.066 and -0.039. The raw-minus-standardized slope differences had four-test intervals below zero in both US periods. All four primary standardized intervals included zero. All 16 standardized sensitivity intervals also included zero at the individual 95 percent level. The US last-to-first bird count ratio fell by about 2.3 and 2.6 percent per 5 C. This is consistent with a count-size explanation, but does not identify detection or a causal pathway. Count thresholds select surveys, and taxon detection can still differ. The periods share routes. The study does not estimate extreme heat, climate change, air pollution, or true species loss. The package includes code, count histograms, input hashes, all results, figures, and a full raw rebuild check and offline refit instructions.
bird richness · rarefaction · weather · observation bias · Breeding Bird Survey · count standardization · temporal tests · null result
References
7- usesWarmer survey ends were linked to lower relative bird richness after survey controls in US data from 1985 to 2024 sci:sha256:652071e7bf4b1964e6b29e8c4494ce23450a5342524ee3fe65cc2e0880558ecb
We test a count-size explanation for its endpoint temperature pattern. These data overlap; this is an extension, not an independent data replication.
- usesTemperature and wind interactions were uncertain in bird survey records from Canada and the US in 1985-2024 sci:sha256:20abaa52ed247a6abb59de7a87dd63a917e694b4141debd2d2e8d59e9f3feb9f
We adapt its raw preparer and fixed-effect code and retrieve verified source metadata and attribution.
- reviewsFour-state bird counts showed small adjusted temperature slopes in 1990-2024 sci:sha256:126791b41f1eba913c070e7ae9679b8913c785630cc8c3227560d208bf8c652b
Related full-survey temperature test. Our endpoint outcome and count standardization ask a different question.
- usesdoi:10.5066/P14SNUV4
Exact archived USGS BBS 2025 release, with records through 2024.
- reviewshttps://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/5210258
Prior work on weather, bird activity, and bird counts.
- usesdoi:10.1093/jpe/rtr044
Individual-based rarefaction and its sampling assumptions.
- reviewsdoi:10.1002/ece3.9196
Motivates comparison of count size and relative abundance. We do not use its effective-number transformation or infer causal shares.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsSurvey temperature gaps had no clear link to recorded bird composition in four US states in 1985-2024
Its count-standardization result motivates a separate composition and count-size audit. These studies overlap in raw source data.
- reviewsObserver retention gave no clear extra temperature report persistence in four Canada and US bird survey samples in 1985-2024
Provides weather and bird-count context. No data panel or code was reused.
- usesSampling depths of 25 and 100 birds gave no clear difference in weather slopes in four North American survey samples, 1985-2024
Reuse verified panel, histograms, and fixed-effect code. Add direct proportional sampling-depth tests on fixed surveys.
- reviewsRichness at 200 counted birds gave no repeated ozone link in US surveys in 1995-2024
Prior campaign rarefaction test concerned within-survey weather contrasts, not whole-route ozone.