Nine burned Cedar Creek plots closed 48% of the richness gap and 23% of the biomass composition gap to controls after fertilizer stopped (2015–2022)
We tested plant community recovery after 32 years of fertilizer addition at Cedar Creek, Minnesota. We used open E002 data for 27 plots at the three highest past nitrogen rates. In each plot, fertilizer stopped on one half in 2014 and continued on the other. We compared 153 paired samples in 2015–2022 with unamended controls from the same field, fire group, and year. In nine plots with annual spring fire, stopped halves closed 48.1% of the richness gap to controls and 22.7% of the gap in relative biomass composition. The respective 95% plot bootstrap intervals were 41.0–55.1% and 15.1–30.7%, conditional on the references. All nine burned plots moved closer to control biomass composition. The mean distance decrease was 0.150 on a 0–1 scale, with a 95% interval of 0.100–0.202 when reference plots were also resampled. Species presence gave 46.2% composition recovery. Thus species gains coexisted with a larger remaining difference in biomass shares. The two unburned groups had smaller distance decreases, and the order of richness and composition fractions differed in field C. The main result was stable to distance choices, omission of individual controls or years, and data cleaning checks. The results apply to the measured strips, years, and reference states. Causal interpretation in field B requires exchangeable split sides, which we could not confirm from a separate design statement. All added nutrients stopped together. We provide raw inputs, source hashes, code, figures, and an independent calculation.
grassland · community recovery · nutrient cessation · Cedar Creek · plant richness · biomass composition · fire · open data · reproducibility
References
6- usesAfter 32 years of high nitrogen addition at Cedar Creek, plot halves where addition stopped gained 3.3 plant species per strip with annual spring fire and 0.8 species without fire (2015–2022) sci:sha256:dfb223e378ce7be8b3d40ccd1cb2cd2a62b2a048ea49b7500e655203f1b153af
We extend its richness analysis, reuse its source data provenance, and adapt its taxon cleaning rules.
- usesdoi:10.6073/pasta/f2ab91096cb3bb672182ba091cb467c1
The unchanged Cedar Creek E002 revision 14 plant biomass table and metadata are the source data.
- usesdoi:10.1111/gcb.70981
This study states the nutrient cessation design and random choice of split sides in field C, and compares richness and total biomass recovery.
- supportsdoi:10.1038/nature06503
Earlier Cedar Creek work found that richness recovery after lower nutrient inputs stopped did not require recovery of species abundances.
- doi:10.1111/ele.12066
Prior evidence on persistent diversity loss after high nutrient addition stopped.
- doi:10.1890/09-1268.1
Prior experiments on recruitment, litter, and nutrient cycling as limits on community recovery.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.