After 32 years of high nitrogen addition at Cedar Creek, plot halves where addition stopped gained 3.3 plant species per strip with annual spring fire and 0.8 species without fire (2015–2022)
Question: does annual spring fire change the recovery of grassland plant richness after a long nitrogen (N) enrichment stops? Approach: in 2014 the Cedar Creek experiment E002 stopped fertilization on one half of each fertilized plot in fields B and C, after 32 years of N addition at 0 to 27.2 g N m-2 yr-1. In field B, three of six plots of each N level have been burned each spring since 1992. We used the public E002 biomass table (revision 14) and compared the two halves of each plot in each sampled year from 2015 to 2022 (408 pairs, 72 plots). The plot was the unit of inference. We tested fire with a randomization test of fire labels within N level. Findings: the within-plot richness gain increased with the previous N rate (0.79 species per strip per unit ln(N+1); 95% interval 0.55 to 1.02). At the three highest N rates in field B, stopped halves gained 3.33 species per strip in burned plots and 0.81 species in unburned plots (difference 2.52; 95% interval 1.81 to 3.26; p = 0.0003). Fire alone did not change richness in halves that stayed fertilized (difference -0.04). With fire, stopped halves closed 48% of the deficit to unamended controls; without fire they closed 17% (field B) and 26% (field C). Native taxa gave 2.46 of the 3.33 species gain, with native C4 grasses giving 0.93. Fire also gave a larger decrease of the introduced grass Agropyron repens and of total biomass, and it removed almost all litter. Plots in field C where N stopped in 1992 still had 3.4 fewer species per strip than controls in 2015-2022. The results held when we removed genus-level taxa, kept woody taxa, removed 2018, or used only years common to both fields, and in Poisson and mixed models. Limitations: one field and one fire regime; 0.3 m2 strips; data end in 2022; the mechanism (litter removal, loss of the dominant grass, or fire benefit to C4 grasses) is not identified; plot coordinates were not available to test spatial dependence.
nitrogen enrichment · cessation · recovery · prescribed fire · grassland · species richness · hysteresis · Cedar Creek LTER · split-plot · randomization test · litter · Elymus repens · C4 grasses · restoration
References
6- usesdoi:10.6073/pasta/f2ab91096cb3bb672182ba091cb467c1
Primary data: Cedar Creek E002 plant aboveground biomass, revision knb-lter-cdr.18.14 (CC BY 4.0), included unchanged.
- usesdoi:10.6073/pasta/ef24de9bc55442766123fc02a405c13f
E097 biomass table (knb-lter-cdr.450.8), used to resolve the cessation flag of field A plot 51.
- doi:10.1111/gcb.70981
He et al. 2026 analyzed recovery after the 1992 and 2014 cessations in unburned field C; we extend to the burned and unburned split plots of field B. Our field C results agree in direction.
- supportsdoi:10.1111/ele.12066
Isbell et al. 2013 reported that richness did not recover two decades after high N addition stopped; our field C 1992 cohort still shows a deficit after 23-30 years.
- supportsdoi:10.1890/09-1268.1
Clark and Tilman 2010 found that litter removal and seed addition helped recovery after N cessation and suggested fire suppression slows recovery; our fire x cessation result agrees with this hypothesis.
- doi:10.1038/nature06503
Clark and Tilman 2008: species loss after chronic low-level N addition at Cedar Creek and recovery after cessation.
Cited by
5 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesAfter high nutrient inputs stopped, plant composition was closer to controls mainly with annual fire in Cedar Creek field B, 2015–2022
We extend its richness analysis of the same Cedar Creek split plots. We reuse its retained source data and follow its taxon name cleaning and exclusions. The composition distances, reference design, and tests here are newly calculated.
- usesNine burned Cedar Creek plots showed 24% biomass composition recovery and 48% richness recovery relative to controls, 2015–2022
We extend its split-plot richness analysis with community distances. We use its retained source data and adapt its MIT cleaning rules. Our rebuilt burned-plot richness values match its results.
- usesCedar Creek field B showed greater plant composition recovery with annual fire after high fertilizer input stopped, in 2015–2022
We use its account of the split design and its cleaning choices. We reproduce its richness means and add composition distances.
- usesAt nine burned Cedar Creek plots, halves where fertilizer stopped had 3.1 more plant taxa detected in at least two surveys, 2019–2022
We extend its annual richness analysis with repeat detection histories and use its declared taxon cleaning map.
- usesNine burned Cedar Creek plots closed 48% of the richness gap and 23% of the biomass composition gap to controls after fertilizer stopped (2015–2022)
We extend its richness analysis, reuse its source data provenance, and adapt its taxon cleaning rules.