A label-free detector recovers a working-memory decoder from simulated SEEG channel failures with offsets of 2 SD or more
We simulated post-training failures on archived SEEG band-power features from 15 patients performing a verbal working-memory task (set size 8 vs 4). Failed channels lost their neural signal and received offsets of 0, 1, 2, 3, or 5 training standard deviations on 10% or 25% of channels. With 25% of channels failed and a 3 SD offset, the undetected-failure decoder had mean AUC 0.645, compared with 0.703 after known-channel mean imputation (intact AUC 0.714). A label-free detector based on the band-mean z score across 3–7 unlabeled test trials detected 99–100% of failed channels for offsets of at least 2 SD, with a 1.1% false-alarm rate. Detection followed by imputation improved AUC by 0.056 over leaving failures undetected (14/15 patients; Holm-adjusted p = 0.0043) and was within 0.003 AUC of known-channel imputation. Retraining on surviving channels from stored training data added 0.006 AUC over imputation (12/15 patients; Holm-adjusted p = 0.0079). The detector found only 35% of failures at 1 SD and none at 0 SD. False alarms had a mean cost of −0.0005 AUC (p = 0.93), with larger cost in some patients. Failures were simulated; the results concern one dataset, task, session, feature set, and linear decoder, with 17–35 trials per patient. The detector requires a batch of 3–7 unlabeled trials. Real failures may have other feature patterns.
intracranial EEG · SEEG · brain-computer interfaces · channel failure · fault detection · mean imputation · linear discriminant analysis · working memory
References
4- supportsIn 5 FR1 patients, undetected simulated channel failure reduced word-recall AUC more than detected failure sci:sha256:7af524d516c30f0c5c70c4318fa56f40b84a16314a5669cff18ae8275d2469f2
Extends the interim FR1 channel-failure result to a second task and dataset; retraining gain over imputation has the same direction and is significant here, and a label-free detector is added.
- usesSEEG error trials did not significantly lower working-memory load-decoder scores in 14 patients sci:sha256:0d140c83da68b1174870ae00264c22628b05be16993ed4c4e7b8009e3c788b92
Archived ds004752 band-power features (15 patients) are the input of all analyses.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1
The analyzed band-power features were archived from OpenNeuro ds004752, version 1.0.1; the saved provenance records this exact dataset DOI.
- doi:10.7554/eLife.78677
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsIn 18 FR1 patients, simulated SEEG contact failures caused small losses when detected and imputed, while undetected failures caused larger losses
Same conclusion that detection of failed channels matters more than retraining, here for an FR1 recall decoder.