At fixed coupling and equal uncoupled variance, fast and slow noise reduced squared S cone signal scores by 13.8% and 0.7% in one passive human foveal model
Electrical coupling can lower voltage noise and mix colour signals. We tested how source-noise time scale changes signal detection in one archived human foveal graph. We kept all 333 named photoreceptor units and 1,141 contact rows. The passive model had equal leaks, independent Gaussian source noise and a coupling-to-leak ratio of 0.0545456 per recorded weight unit. Each noise model had equal uncoupled voltage variance. At a readout of the 16 labelled S cones, coupling reduced the squared detection score for S-only drive by 0.73% with slow noise and 13.85% with fast noise. Both cases had lower voltage variance. For common drive, the score rose by 34.62% and 16.34%. For opposite S and LM drive, it fell by 30.03% and 38.92%. Intermediate noise rates gave intermediate scores. All four assignments of two uncertain S labels gave the same time-scale effect. Reading all 333 voltages recovered the slow-noise S-only score but did not recover the fast-noise loss. Removing output covariance gave a false 42.45% slow-noise common-drive score gain at full readout. Independent parsers, sparse solves, Lyapunov equations, simulation and a fresh full run checked the results. The package includes the full source table, graph, code, 10,080 result rows, figures, provenance and repeat instructions. These are single-sample scores in a fixed linear model. They do not measure human colour vision. Active currents, feedback, nonlinear readout and measured tissue noise are outside the tested scope.
human fovea · connectome · electrical coupling · S cones · noise time scale · signal detection · noise covariance · passive model
References
5- usesNumeric ID groups raised mean S response to LM drive from 0.138 to 0.257 in one human foveal model with 2.5 nS leak and 136.364 pS per weight unit sci:sha256:0dbd4c5b4747e329cf86cf4c7276f76d5a70a67daeed7c55bcaedd52c19bf1dc
We reuse the source-table cache, source metadata, local-name convention and primary passive parameters. We rebuild the complete graph and add noise time scales and detection scores.
- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.17792059
The fixed v1 archive contains the complete photoreceptor contact table used here.
- doi:10.1073/pnas.2603286123
The source human foveal study predicts signal mixing and asks how coupling relates to noise and colour signals.
- doi:10.1364/JOSAA.17.000635
This prior cone model studies signal mixing and the colour cost of electrical coupling.
- doi:10.1098/rspb.1988.0043
This prior theory shows that coupling benefits depend on the stimulus and downstream readout.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- With independent white noise and free LM drive, averages at 16 S outputs kept at most 10.23% of uncoupled information in one passive human foveal model
[Legacy relation: reproduces] We reproduce its fixed-LM fast-noise snapshot and slow-noise endpoint ratios. We extend the test to finite voltage averages and a free constant LM amplitude.
- supportsIndependent ribbon models matched 32 zebrafish cone summaries and did not fix each ribbon's SNR
The prior passive human retinal model shows that covariance changes readout scores. Our exact marginal-pair bounds give a related identification limit using zebrafish response data. We reuse no code or data from that publication.
- Under slow independent noise and no added readout noise, 72 cone outputs were necessary and sufficient for full S-only detection in one archived passive human foveal model
[Legacy relation: reproduces] We reproduce its independent slow-noise S-panel score. We extend the analysis to the smallest exact coordinate panel and common input noise.