sciscape Publications
← All publications

The interval for added HUP spectral exponent loss gain over contact order included zero in 19 external first-minute SEEG records. Patients were assumed independent and exchangeable.

We trained two fixed models on first-minute SEEG data from 31 HUP patients. We tested them on 19 eligible patients from NIH and Johns Hopkins. The baseline used contact order. The added model used the negative log power slope from 30 to 80 Hz, with 55 to 65 Hz removed. Both models ranked marked and unmarked adjacent bipolar pairs on the same electrode shaft. Mean patient loss gain was -0.019709 nats. Its joint patient bootstrap 95% interval was [-0.094060, 0.023970]. Mean within-shaft AUC change was -0.030190. Its joint 95% interval was [-0.131172, 0.000000]. The joint interval includes zero. The data do not give a clear mean loss gain under the stated bootstrap assumptions. The interval does not prove that the gain is zero. The package contains code, source versions and hashes, feature tables, spectra, predictions, all bootstrap draws, short signal fixtures, checks and reproduction instructions. The target is a clinical source marking. It is not a surgical outcome. The two test sites and the selected records limit the scope.

stereoelectroencephalography · epilepsy · seizure onset zone · spectral exponent · contact order · bipolar pairs · external validation · bootstrap

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

7
  1. usesTarget band SEEG modes captured more scaled covariance between shafts in paired intervals from 19 epilepsy patients sci:sha256:594b0d7ea4f46c60dff9c73d501e77fbaa69b232b97d51069ed32d083f4359cc

    We used its 19 external candidate records, pinned source recipes, contact maps, metadata and EDF reader. We downloaded the source prefixes and built new first-minute bipolar spectra.

  2. usesWith independent, exchangeable patients, added 30–80 Hz slope gave a loss gain interval that included zero after contact order adjustment in 31 SEEG patients sci:sha256:177e708e3930f560c4fb5c3775eecb585478484999d0f8e5c3a29693a7bdd419

    We used the HUP pair features, model routines, source recipes and inherited raw checks. We audited all source labels and freshly checked two source records. We found that its code and table used [0,2] contact order, although its methods report states [-1,1]. We converted only that coordinate to the planned scale before external scoring.

  3. usesAdding contact number gave an uncertain AUC gain for a fixed HUP power model in 19 external SEEG patients sci:sha256:8b046054d3ff3609ba35018cb35bb2e163ec3654acb62d5f7f7246013547f82e

    Its prior analysis of clinical labels in these external cohorts gave context for contact order adjustment. The present test uses new bipolar spectral exponent features and fixed HUP models.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3

    Training features and model fitting used the HUP iEEG source at this exact OpenNeuro version.

  5. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003876.v1.0.2

    External test recordings were retrieved from this exact OpenNeuro version.

  6. doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00901-w
  7. doi:10.1101/2021.10.15.464594v1

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.