Nonvisual sense profiles had positive EEG relations for 463 objects, but shared tests with two fMRI studies failed
We tested whether differences in five nonvisual sense ratings go with differences in visual brain patterns. Public human studies supplied EEG and BOLD fMRI from separate cohorts. We removed 12 rated object properties, visual strength, total nonvisual strength, action-profile distance, object effects and a measured visual neural control. Development used two EEG people and 71 concepts. A local code lock preceded tests in eight other EEG people and three MRI people on 463 other concepts. Base mean partial correlations were 0.02242 and 0.02894; their 95% person Student limits were [0.00775,0.03709] and [-0.02209,0.07981]. Category controls left positive EEG means but uncertain MRI means. A later fixed follow-up used 28 concepts, the same EEG people and a separate 18-person MRI study. Base means were 0.03676 and -0.01586. All four shared tests failed Holm correction. Negative people and all object and joint resampling ranges remain. A new solver fits weighted object and category terms jointly during whole-object resampling. Dense fits, a numerical repeat and a source rebuild checked the computation. The package includes permitted compact inputs, code, exact source pins and terms, plans, all results, figures and repeat steps. Three-person MRI precision, reused EEG, source selection, different images and tasks, overlapping EEG responses, word-level norms and incomplete visual controls limit scope. No positive neural generalization across EEG and fMRI or causal result was confirmed.
human neuroscience · EEG · fMRI · object perception · sensory associations · representational similarity · negative results · object resampling · THINGS
References
12- usesTests of 475 and 31 object concepts did not confirm a shared relation between ease of handling and human EEG and fMRI patterns sci:sha256:4da582266714e22dcc2c8dbde7347fbf083f927bc70da50b67a8f384953ffb32
We reuse verified licensed compact neural inputs, concept matches, source pins, the public fetch recipe and endpoint algebra. We extend the weighted category adjustment and test a new sensory-composition endpoint.
- A fixed sound change test did not confirm shared gains in 18 ECoG patients and five fMRI adults sci:sha256:0308dec380e27f2cd7f8bb9c6e9c75ac5471ef07ea2821ed61ccfe3d0d9ea125
Recent related SCI work led us to reject a close music-change question before any new neural fit.
- doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z
- doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01965-7
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119754
- doi:10.7554/eLife.82580
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.21192832
- doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae383
- doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02110-8
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120010
- doi:10.7554/eLife.82566
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223792
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesAt neutral rating 4, EEG and fMRI tests did not confirm extremity geometry; one object set the 26-object contrast
Upstream compact source and MIT pair routines through the immediate verified source; notices are retained.
- usesFor 455 objects, all 256 source maps gave positive adjusted taxonomy scores in eight EEG and three fMRI adults
We reuse its verified compact inputs, source receipts and projection code.