sciscape Publications
← All publications

In 322 Allen Neuropixels probes of mouse visual cortex, the unipolar LFP alpha-beta/gamma crossover was in layer 5, 220 µm below CCF layer 4; bipolar and CSD signals did not show the gradient

Question: Mendoza-Halliday et al. (2024) proposed that the depth where relative alpha-beta and gamma LFP power cross marks cortical layer 4. In mouse, they assigned layers from this pattern itself. We tested the crossover against anatomical layers. Approach: We used 322 Neuropixels probes in visual cortex of 57 mice (Allen Brain Observatory Visual Coding). We read grey-screen and flash-block LFP by HTTP byte ranges. We labelled each channel with its CCFv3 layer and found the flash CSD early sink. A FLIP-like search found the pattern and its crossover in unipolar, common-average, bipolar and CSD-domain signals. Intervals are session-bootstrap 95% intervals. Results: The pattern occurred in 81% of probes (unipolar) and 77% (common average), but in 11% (bipolar) and 4% (CSD), against 2% for shuffled depth order. The unipolar crossover was a median 218 µm (205-237) below the CCF layer-4 centre. It was in layer 5 in 149 of 170 probes and inside layer 4 in 2.4%. Common-average crossovers were 310 µm deeper than layer 4. An atlas rule without LFP predicted layer-4 depth with a 20 µm median error; a calibrated crossover gave 54 µm. The crossover tracked layer-4 depth only through cortical thickness. The flash CSD early sink was 90 µm above the layer-4 centre and about 300 µm above the crossover. Flash stimulation and running moved the crossover by only 5 and 20 µm. Limitation: CCF layers come from track registration, not local histology, and the CSD sink and CCF layer 4 disagree by about 90 µm. Our algorithm is not the published FLIP code. The result applies to head-fixed mouse visual cortex only.

local field potential · spectrolaminar motif · cortical layers · layer 4 · current source density · Neuropixels · Allen Brain Observatory · mouse visual cortex · CCFv3 · volume conduction · FLIP · laminar identification

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

7
  1. challenges, reviewsdoi:10.1038/s41593-023-01554-7

    Source of the spectrolaminar motif and the FLIP method; we test its layer-4 crossover claim against anatomy in the same mouse data set.

  2. usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-020-03171-x

    Allen Brain Observatory Visual Coding Neuropixels data set (LFP, channel CCF coordinates, stimulus tables).

  3. usesdoi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.007

    Allen CCFv3 annotation used for channel layer labels.

  4. supportsdoi:10.1101/2024.09.18.613490

    Preprint that questions whether the crossover identifies layer 4; our mouse result agrees with this concern.

  5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247776/

    Rebuttal preprint that defends the motif with histology in primates.

  6. useshttps://allen-brain-observatory.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/visual-coding-neuropixels/ecephys-cache/channels.csv

    Channel CCF coordinates (SHA-256 d2932f1e...).

  7. useshttps://download.alleninstitute.org/informatics-archive/current-release/mouse_ccf/annotation/ccf_2017/annotation_10.nrrd

    CCFv3 2017 10 um annotation volume (SHA-256 a9e9654e...).

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.