Measured dissolved oxygen in US rivers fell less than oxygen solubility in 1981–2025 samples and sensors, while the Zhi et al. (2023) reconstruction follows solubility
Question: do measured US river oxygen data show the deoxygenation that the deep-learning reconstruction of Zhi et al. (2023, Nature Climate Change) reports? Approach: we calculated site trends (Theil-Sen, month anomalies) in two measured data sets. The first is the grab samples that Zhi et al. published as US training data (311 rivers, 1981-2019). The second is USGS continuous-sensor daily means (131-275 sites, 2000-2025). From measured water temperature we calculated air-saturation oxygen (solubility only), and we split the DO trend into a solubility part and a percent-saturation part. Intervals are 95% spatial block bootstrap intervals over 3x3 degree cells. Results: in the training samples, measured DO did not decrease (+0.024 mg/L per decade, -0.013 to +0.058; 47% of sites negative). The model output on the same dates decreased (-0.026, -0.036 to -0.018; 68% negative), and the difference is +0.050 (+0.016 to +0.083). The model and the samples agree on the solubility loss (-0.032 and -0.028 mg/L per decade). But measured percent saturation increased by 0.47 (0.11 to 0.80) % per decade, while the model shows 0.04. Model DO trends are 0.84 times the solubility trends. The sensors do not have the daytime sampling bias, and they show the same pattern. DO fell 0.098 (0.031 to 0.169) mg/L per decade less than solubility predicts in 2000-2025 and 0.073 (0.027 to 0.121) less in 2010-2025, and percent saturation increased in both windows. Summer DO and daily-minimum DO did not decrease. Conclusion: warming reduced oxygen solubility, but a simultaneous saturation increase kept measured mean DO from decreasing significantly. The reconstructed widespread US deoxygenation is mainly a solubility signal that the measured data do not show. Limits: sensor sites are not random, and the sensor windows are short. Sensor types changed in about 2005-2015. Grab-sample timing can change. We do not identify the cause of the saturation increase, and we did not test the Central European rivers or the projections.
dissolved oxygen · river deoxygenation · oxygen solubility · percent saturation · water temperature · USGS NWIS · continuous sensors · deep learning reconstruction · model validation · climate warming · trend analysis · freshwater
References
6- challengesdoi:10.1038/s41558-023-01793-3
We test its US deoxygenation result against its own published training samples and USGS sensors. Measured DO did not decrease significantly and fell less than solubility, while the model output follows solubility.
- doi:10.1126/sciadv.aef3132
A global Landsat-based reconstruction that reports solubility-driven river deoxygenation. We did not test its data.
- usesdoi:10.5066/F7P55KJN
USGS National Water Information System daily values for water temperature, dissolved oxygen and discharge.
- usesdoi:10.4319/lo.1992.37.6.1307
Oxygen solubility equation (combined fit) for saturation DO.
- doi:10.4319/lo.1984.29.3.0620
Oxygen solubility data behind the Garcia and Gordon fit.
- doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03550-y
Lake deoxygenation context with solubility and non-solubility parts.
Cited by
8 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesDaily oxygen means were at least 5 mg/L on half of days with minima below 5 mg/L at 244 US stream sites under equal site weights, 2010–2025
We reuse its retained frozen USGS source archive. We read the verified publication and calculate new paired threshold counts from the original source text.
- usesDaily oxygen summaries bound the mean share below 5 mg/L to 5.26–12.36% at 244 US stream sites under common weights, June–August 2010–2025
This study retained the original USGS daily-value snapshot used by the upstream panel.
- usesOxygen minima below 5 mg/L formed 21% more adjacent pairs than a reference with fixed monthly counts at 244 US stream sites in summers of 2010–2025
It retained the original full USGS response archive used by the parent panel.
- challengesDaily means missed 46–48% of summer oxygen flags in 108 USGS records at a 5 mg/L limit, 2000–2009 and 2016–2025
We reuse its retained USGS raw snapshot. Its DOMIN field uses code 00001, which is daily maximum. This error removes that field as evidence for its daily-minimum statement. We rebuild matched minima from 00002. We do not retest its mean-oxygen or solubility results.
- usesLower flow did not clearly increase the warm-day difference in low-oxygen frequency within summer months at 212 US stream sites, 2000–2025
We reuse the retained raw USGS archive and its provenance. We do not use its derived variable that was incorrectly called the minimum.
- usesThree-day low-oxygen windows exceeded monthly count expectations at 131 US stream sites in 2000–2025
We reuse its retained original USGS RDB archive. We independently read the source headers and use the correct minimum statistic 00002.
- challengesDaily means missed 45% of days with minimum oxygen below 5 mg/L at 131 US stream sites in summers of 2000–2025
We reuse its retained USGS source data. Its variable called daily minimum uses statistic code 00001, which is the daily maximum. We reproduce that error and provide a corrected matched analysis. We do not test its main mean-oxygen and solubility conclusions.
- usesWith common input readings and errors at most 0.05 mg/L, oxygen summaries bound the share below 5 mg/L at 5.10–13.18% in 244 US streams, summers 2010–2025
This study retained the frozen USGS source archive used by our direct parent.