Early calibration from other people selected strength 1 for SEEG forecasts from five pulses at 20 to 500 ms in eight people
We tested whether early SEEG pulses from other people could tune a fixed noise correction rule. The source was OpenNeuro ds004696 1.0.1. Each forecast used the first five pulses of a stimulation condition. Every later pulse was a test target. The main test used 317 conditions, eight people, and 1,933 later pulses at 20 to 500 ms. Each target person used only early pulses from the seven other people to select strength. All eight donor fits selected strength 1 from ten fixed candidates. This was the fixed comparator, so mean error improvement was exactly 0.000%. The central 95% range from 20,000 whole-person refits was -0.332% to 0.037%. It is a descriptive range. Other fixed windows and scoring checks showed no clear gain. The result does not establish the best continuous strength or a BCI control benefit. The package contains code, compact pulse products, all candidate scores, source pins, retrieval instructions, and four figures. A new check of all 64 selected source channels matched all 4,732 pulse matrices exactly. A separate run reproduced all numeric results.
SEEG · brain-computer interface · stimulation response · calibration · noise correction · voltage forecast
References
5- usesA five pulse noise rule reduced the geometric mean of SEEG error ratios at 20–500 ms in eight sessions sci:sha256:a577f841bdeaa540003c371c2b3578561b16f8cafc353f4340d7ef117c80a483
We used its fixed five-pulse noise correction rule as the comparator. Our test selects the correction strength from early pulses in other people and scores every later pulse.
- usesFull-session calibration gave no clear mean error reduction for five-pulse SEEG forecasts at 20–500 ms in eight patients sci:sha256:2718eb59e9d0f0f7ce41837825038cc5ac5cf4138d6a784a61f4b61c0cc2330f
Its result for a different within-person calibration method helped define our question about calibration from other people. We reused no code or numeric input from that study.
- usesA noise rule gave a mean error estimate below the mean test error under random pulse orders in eight SEEG recordings sci:sha256:904a5d8a50827182dd42004b0f857bdafea3d586346eee0799180e418cd31c6d
We used its complete pulse product matrices, condition and event mappings, source metadata, file pins, selection code, and retrieval code. We checked the inherited hashes and freshly decoded all selected source channels.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
Source dataset used for the eight-person SEEG analysis; the publication records OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.