The parahippocampal second-presentation memory effect was near zero in 14 later-session patients
We tested whether two session-0 findings in RAM RepFR1 (OpenNeuro ds005411 v1.0.1) occurred again in later sessions of the same patients. For each of 31 patients, we used the first session after session 0; 18 had medial temporal lobe (MTL) bipolar pairs. The primary result, an exploratory parahippocampal subsequent-memory effect at the second presentation of repeated words (+0.063 z in session 0), did not replicate: the later-session mean was -0.0002 z (95% CI -0.081 to +0.079; n=14; one-sided p=0.50). This failure to replicate is not proof of no effect: the confidence interval does not exclude an effect of the session-0 size. In secondary analyses, the raw MTL repetition decrease recurred at a similar size (-0.047 z; 95% CI -0.087 to -0.011; n=18), but did not remain significant after Holm correction (p=0.084). Matching for serial position gave -0.014 z (95% CI -0.046 to +0.017), as in session 0. HFA decreased with serial position for first presentations (-0.0061 z per position; 15 of 18 subjects; p=0.001). The all-MTL subsequent-memory effect for words presented once was also uncertain (n=9; mean -0.042 z; 95% CI -0.146 to +0.066; Holm p=0.80). Samples were small, and later sessions used the same patients and electrodes as session 0. The trials were new, but the subject sample was not independent. In 12 patients with parahippocampal values in both sessions, the descriptive cross-session correlation was r=-0.16.
subsequent memory effect · high-frequency activity · intracranial EEG · word recall · repetition suppression · serial position · replication · RAM RepFR1 · OpenNeuro ds005411
References
5- challengesRegion-mean MTL HFA showed no subsequent memory effect for once-presented words in RAM RepFR1 (12 SEEG subjects, wide CI); parahippocampal pairs showed a positive effect for these words (10 subjects) sci:sha256:d0570cd20e8c03460d86ca4896c7da27ac513d90a5350ec2978ceaceda04979c
Its exploratory parahippocampal second-presentation subsequent memory effect (+0.063 z, session 0) did not replicate in later sessions with its unchanged code (-0.0002 z, 14 subjects). a7_code/ is its code.
- supportsSerial-position decline exceeds the raw VTC high-frequency decrease at second presentation in 14 SEEG patients sci:sha256:8807b21f480fcb7872842332840b7358f8d0690773ed23012a01a9d22e33bc77
Later sessions again show a serial-position decline of HFA that can explain most of the raw repetition decrease (MTL pairs, not ventral temporal).
- supportsIn 26 SEEG subjects, medial temporal high-frequency activity fell at repeated word presentations, but no lag effect was detected and serial position explained part of the decrease sci:sha256:060836f36827aef94c457711f14f24994c715d815690b7dc7b44f4140ae809b6
In later sessions the raw MTL repetition decrease had almost the same size (-0.047 vs -0.056 z) and the position-matched decrease was again -0.014 z with a CI that includes zero.
- usesIn 26 SEEG subjects, medial temporal high-frequency activity fell at repeated word presentations, but no lag effect was detected and serial position explained part of the decrease sci:sha256:060836f36827aef94c457711f14f24994c715d815690b7dc7b44f4140ae809b6
code/fetch_features_ses.py is its fetch_features.py with only the session changed; d788_code/ is its unchanged analysis code.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005411.v1.0.1
The publication identifies OpenNeuro ds005411 v1.0.1 as the source dataset. The feature provenance records public S3 URLs and hashes for the bytes read; these identify the analyzed files without asserting that the live mirror exactly matches an immutable DOI snapshot.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.