An inverse-time curve tied to the earlier mean does not fit the 2020–2024 W1 data for WD 0145+234 with the tested visit errors
We tested one inverse-time decay curve for WD 0145+234. We used ten NEOWISE visits from January 2020 through July 2024 and eight reference visits from 2014–2018. We reused a signed SCI data package. The new covariance includes target errors and correlations from a bootstrap of whole comparison sources. The curve limit is tied to the uncertain reference mean. Its pole is bounded by observations used in an earlier heuristic model. The best W1 residual score is Q = 176.81. No score in 10,000 simulations of the fitted model is this large. A separate W2 test gives Q = 77.92. The mismatch remains after each single-visit omission and under alternate calibration and quality choices. Adding independent 2% visit errors gives W1 Q = 73.54. Adding 5% gives Q = 18.64 and weakens the test. A free-limit curve improves W1 Q to 22.34, but it also has excess residuals. Its fitted limit is not evidence for a permanent level. The result applies to the tested monochromatic curve and error model. It does not reject a general collisional cascade or establish a new dust event. The package preserves source data, signed provenance, covariance matrices, fit results, simulation scores, code, figures, and offline reproduction steps.
WD 0145+234 · white dwarf debris · NEOWISE · infrared variability · inverse-time decay · model testing · correlated calibration errors · reproducible astronomy
References
7- usesWD 0145+234 had a higher mean flux at 3.4 micrometers in three 2023–2024 visits than in eight 2014–2018 visits sci:sha256:b08aee5fad66eef89cc285c0bb27f3c13a8212642043299a0773831b1275d127
We reuse its signed source measurements, download receipts, comparison-source selection, and reduction code. We add decay fits and full covariance tests.
- usesdoi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad198
Its heuristic decay curve supplies the inverse-time form and the observational bounds used for the pole parameter. We test WISE data and do not refit its Spitzer or JWST data.
- usesdoi:10.26131/IRSA144
The final NEOWISE source table supplies the frozen target and comparison measurements through July 2024.
- usesdoi:10.26131/IRSA1
AllWISE supplies the parent comparison-source selection and source positions.
- usesdoi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab53ed
This work found the outburst and supplies the position, proper motion, and nearby-source context used by the parent reduction.
- doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1738
- doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5be7
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesThe 2020–2024 mean GD 56 flux exceeds a 2014–2019 inverse-time forecast that approaches the stellar flux
The verified WD 0145+234 study informed the whole-record control bootstrap and conditional forecast test. No code or data are reused.
- usesOne line fits the two-band fluxes of WD 0145+234 in ten 2020–2024 NEOWISE visits under the tested error model
Supplies the ten-visit time scope and the earlier restricted time-law test that motivates this separate spectral test.
- supportsEarly inverse-time fits with a fixed baseline predict too little 2022–2024 NEOWISE flux for WD 0145+234
This study already found that one inverse-time curve does not fit the full decline. We add a retrospective forecast from only the first three decline visits, with a separate reduction.