sciscape Publications
← All publications

Patient SEEG mean squared differences were 0.74 to 2.16 times five-pulse noise predictions at 20–500 ms in eight sessions

We tested a five-pulse noise model on 886 SEEG readouts at 86 sites in eight patients. At 20–500 ms, patient observed-to-predicted ratios ranged from 0.74 to 2.16. Their geometric mean was 1.10, with a 95% patient bootstrap interval of 0.84–1.50. A joint pulse-rank split test did not show excess early-to-late separation under pulse exchangeability (p = 0.504). The package contains exact products, source checks, results, and figures; GPL analysis code is omitted, so executable reproduction is unavailable from this package. The test does not establish accurate calibration for each patient.

stereoelectroencephalography · electrical stimulation · pulse averaging · response calibration · noise model · brain-computer interface

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesSeven calibration pulses gave a 3.33% mean person error reduction over five for centered 20 to 500 ms SEEG at 86 selected readouts in eight sessions sci:sha256:c1b64649cc433b08d3074a99c4420a6c7e2b7664ab1d861e53d8e916eea68b92

    This publication supplied the inherited waveform package and five-pulse readout choices used for checks.

  2. usesFive calibration pulses gave mean later signed template AUC of 0.939 compared with 0.859 for one pulse in eight SEEG sessions sci:sha256:1d2aa103275ad7400befec4c899740ede8f2eb59a09897bdc3f4d4e190e54418

    This publication supplied exact candidate pulse products, source metadata, and source rebuild records.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1

    Source dataset analyzed in this study, version 1.0.1.

  4. supportsdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023

    Describes the source single-pulse stimulation experiment.

  5. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.