Five calibration pulses gave mean later signed template AUC of 0.939 compared with 0.859 for one pulse in eight SEEG sessions

1. usesFour pulses gave better mean response ranks than one pulse in five offline bipolar SEEG tests sci:sha256:c9015b4b89ceffc195f0e36e740e7eae7d03e41d8ed41a831cef61e3e6bd2754

   This study of pulse count for stimulation-choice ranking informed the calibration-cost question. It supplied no data or code for the present analysis.

2. usesFive-pulse signed templates did not show a clear AUC gain over energy on energy-selected pairs in eight epilepsy SEEG sessions sci:sha256:1406cee5468018906da44ece44823d82527f4a950f45c030e4c2416839f1b976

   This publication supplied exact joint waveform products, source hashes, metadata, and the fixed five-pulse benchmark. We used these inputs to test one to five calibration pulses on the same later pulses.

3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1

   The analyzed source data are OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1.

4. supportsdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023

   Describes the source cohort and stimulation experiment used for this analysis.

5. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

• usesStudent t limits scored worse than normal limits for centered SEEG voltage at 86 selected sites after five fit pulses

  This work supplied the readout selection rule from five early pulses. We kept its 86 readouts and did not select them by interval score.

• usesEnergy showed no clear AUC gain over waveform matching at 200–500 ms with early pair calibration in eight SEEG sessions

  This study uses the five-pulse signed mean-waveform score and the shared-pair energy comparator.

• usesThresholds from other patients gave 5.33 percent background calls after five fit pulses in eight SEEG sessions

  We kept its five-pulse contact choices at 86 sites. We kept the corrected event time order and eligibility rules.

• usesFive fit pulses left 54.4% of later 20 to 500 ms SEEG waveform variation outside their residual span at 86 selected sites in eight people

  This record supplied the first-five readout choice rule and selected pair table through the immediate input. We preserved its selection code. We did not use later outcomes to choose contacts.

• usesGeometric medians of five traces increased 20–500 ms SEEG error compared with means in eight sessions without added faults

  The inherited readout choices use only the first five good pulses. We retrieved the source choice table and confirmed all 86 choices at selection_n=5. The cohort is the same and is not an independent replication.

• usesAn allocation from two early pulses did not establish lower maximum 20 to 500 ms SEEG mean response error at a fixed budget in eight offline sessions

  This study supplied the earlier five-pulse readout rule and fixed choices preserved in the input archive. This study keeps those choices. The readout selection is not independent of all candidate calibration voltage.

• usesDonor correlations gave 0.005 lower mean AUC than local correlations with eight features and five fit pulses at 86 SEEG sites in eight patients

  This study keeps its contact choices from the first five pulses. The choice defines the 86 readouts and limits the tested scope.

• usesEight donor shapes gave less forecast error and 0.002 lower mean response AUC than eight cosines after five fit pulses at 86 SEEG sites in eight sessions

  We retain its five-pulse contact choices and full signed-template reader.

• usesA weight selected from five early pulses did not show lower 20 to 500 ms SEEG forecast error than one scale at 86 selected sites in eight sessions

  Used its selection_n=5 choices to fix one remote bipolar readout at each of 86 sites. The original choice used only the first five good pulses. Readout selection was not repeated within heldout folds or changed using later errors.

• usesA fixed voltage gate had higher mean SEEG waveform forecast error than matched random selection in eight epilepsy sessions

  Its first-five response energy rule supplied the fixed bipolar readout choices through the input archive.

• usesSeparate thresholds at five checks raised background calls from 29.7% to 53.8% at 86 selected SEEG sites in eight patients with three calibration pulses

  This study keeps its first-five-pulse contact selection. The saved selection choices and candidate metadata define the 86 readouts used here.

• usesA fixed pre-pulse RMS rule increased mean SEEG interval scores after five fit pulses at 86 selected sites

  This publication supplied the readout choices from five early pulses and the candidate contact tables. We kept those choices fixed. The package preserves its choice code and citation.

• usesFive-pulse estimator selection increased observed normalized waveform error at 86 sites in eight SEEG sessions without added faults

  We kept its five-response recording pair choices fixed at all 86 stimulation sites.

• usesVariance weights from five baseline pulses gave no clear AUC gain for eight cosine features at 86 SEEG sites in eight patients

  Retained its first-five-pulse contact choice among 886 eligible readouts, selection tables, and credited selection code. This analysis is conditional on those fixed choices and does not rerun every candidate score.

• usesA linear input from voltage size before a pulse, fit in other patients, increased SEEG forecast error at 86 readouts in eight epilepsy sessions

  Uses its first-five readout choices, candidate contact tables, and selected comparison windows through the immediate input archive. Later forecast error did not select the readout.

• usesAn exact sign-flip test passed at 70 of 86 SEEG sites with six retained pulses and a 20–500 ms window in eight people from ds004696

  Uses its 32 exact SEEG product, candidate, site, and waveform input files, its corrected event order, fixed candidate eligibility, source metadata, hashes, and GPL source downloader. This study changes the pair statistic and fit/test split; it does not reuse parent energy-based choices.

• usesA linear pulse-gap rule did not reduce mean SEEG size forecast error at 85 sites in eight epilepsy sessions

  This work fixed the five-pulse readout choices and candidate criteria. We used its selection_n=5 choices without selection from later forecast losses.

• usesPair choice with five reused controls raised background calls under random roles in eight SEEG sessions

  Its five-pulse monitoring results helped define the new question about pair choice and background rank calibration.

• usesA 30 Hz template derivative captured more later SEEG variation after pulses than before pulses at 86 selected sites in eight patients

  We kept its five-early-pulse selection of one remote bipolar readout at each of 86 stimulation sites. Its selection code and choice tables came through the direct compact input. We did not select contacts again.

• usesDonor covariance raised mean 16-mode SEEG response AUC after five local fit pulses at 86 selected sites in eight patients

  The test kept this study's first-five-pulse contact selection through the direct input. The inherited energy rule limits the result to 86 selected readouts.

• usesRecorded pulse gaps from 2 to 8 seconds had no clear mean SEEG gain relation in eight sessions with site and order controls

  Uses its five-pulse readout choices, exact comparison waveforms, pinned sources, and source retrieval code. Adds all good pulse windows and the recorded pulse history test.

• usesA sequential pulse quota gave no clear error gain over random allocation in an offline test of 20 to 500 ms SEEG from eight sessions

  We keep its first-five recording pair choices through the direct input archive. This fixed selection defines the tested readouts.

• usesPooling three background samples per site gave finite rank thresholds at a 5% target in six of eight SEEG patients

  This publication supplied the fixed first-five-pulse bipolar readout choices and candidate selection code. We kept these choices for all 86 sites.

• usesAn updated local RMS model did not establish lower SEEG forecast error at 86 selected readouts in eight sessions

  Its first-five-pulse readout choices are fixed inputs to this study. We inherited these choices through the all-pulse archive and checked their identifiers. Later response targets did not select a new readout.

• usesA 20–100 ms energy update gave mixed forecast results in eight reused SEEG sessions with five calibration pulses

  This work supplied the inherited five-pulse choice of one recording pair per site. The present test applies to those selected readouts and does not repeat contact selection.

• usesAn added five-pulse mean gave higher mean 7 Hz phase consistency than later signals at 86 selected SEEG sites

  This work set the readout choices with the first five good pulses. We kept those choices. The phase result is limited to this selected cohort.

• usesA 7 Hz phase term increased mean relative amplitude error at 86 selected SEEG sites with five fit pulses

  We used all 86 readout choices from its first-five-pulse energy rule. We kept these choices fixed and did not select sites with the new test scores. We preserved its choice table and selection code.

• usesFour separate thresholds gave mean background calls of 42.6% versus 16.7% for one joint threshold with fixed scores and random roles in eight SEEG sessions

  Supplies the fixed eight-person cohort, 86 eligible sites, 886 candidate products, corrected event order, and source hash recipes. All products were rebuilt from the eight source MAT files and matched exactly.

• usesPair selection at 200 to 500 ms did not show a clear SEEG AUC gain with five calibration pulses in eight sessions

  This study used its signed projection baseline and adapted its source download recipe. Full and 100 to 500 ms products matched exactly. The full-window AUC baseline was also reproduced.

• usesA ±9.77 ms delay search increased mean before-pulse SEEG call rates at fixed template thresholds in eight patients

  This test retained its first-five readout choices and used its fixed signed template detector as a reference method. The present test uses a shorter common time interval. It does not claim an exact replay of the earlier full-window AUC.

• usesSelection of time bins from five pulses reduced storage and increased mean later SEEG error at 86 sites in eight reused sessions

  The input readouts use its first-five-pulse choice of one remote bipolar pair per site. We preserved its choice table and did not search for a new spatial readout after scoring later pulses.

• usesA fixed background power rule increased 20 to 500 ms SEEG size forecast error after five calibration pulses in eight sessions

  Uses its first-five-pulse choices of one remote bipolar readout at each of 86 sites. The choices stay fixed for the new forecasts and are rebuilt in new source audits.

• usesThresholds from other patients gave a 10.2% mean background call rate at a 5% target after five fit pulses at 86 selected SEEG sites in eight patients

  Retained its first-five-pulse readout choices and inherited selection code through the direct input package. No new readout was selected with later test pulses.

• usesSEEG bands with fitted shapes had 6.8% lower normalized half-width than constant bands on average for 20–500 ms responses at 86 sites in eight patients

  This study kept its five-pulse readout choices at 86 stimulation sites. No new readout search used calibration or test waveforms.

• usesAfter five calibration pulses, a 100 ms endpoint gave mean later AUC of 0.951 for fixed SEEG pairs in eight sessions

  This work supplied the exact candidate products, native single-trial windows, source metadata, and source recipe. We kept its five-pulse pair choices and chronological test split, reproduced its full-window AUC, and tested shorter observation endpoints.

• usesSix checks gave no clear AUC gain over one 100 ms check in eight SEEG sessions after eight calibration pulses

  This publication defined the first-five energy selection rule and the fixed readout choices inherited through the direct input. We kept those choices and checked the stored budget-choice union. We did not repeat its full candidate search.

• usesSeven calibration pulses gave a 3.33% mean person error reduction over five for centered 20 to 500 ms SEEG at 86 selected readouts in eight sessions

  We keep its first-five readout choices and use its candidate edge records and comparison windows through the complete pulse input package.

• usesFive fit pulses and three calibration pulses gave 75.6% mean patient and 70.3% pooled whole response coverage at 86 selected SEEG sites

  This study keeps the readout choices from the five pulse selection rule. The package preserves the choice table, candidate edge tables, and selection code for source inspection.

• usesPatient SEEG mean squared differences were 0.74 to 2.16 times five-pulse noise predictions at 20–500 ms in eight sessions

  This publication supplied exact candidate pulse products, source metadata, and source rebuild records.

• usesEarly SEEG template deviation gave 52.7% mean agreement with late error ranks after five fit pulses at 86 sites in eight patients

  Used its fixed selected recording pairs and first-five pulse calibration choices at 86 sites. No new contact selection used the test scores.

• usesDonor response covariance gave higher mean 16-mode SEEG forecast scores than background covariance at 86 selected sites in eight people

  Keeps its first-five-pulse readout selection through the direct input. These choices define the scope of 86 selected stimulation sites.

• usesFour frequency scales did not show lower mean 20–500 ms centered bipolar SEEG forecast error than one scale at 86 selected sites in eight sessions with five calibration pulses

  Supplied the selection_n=5 readout choices made from early after-versus-before log energy. We used one of these fixed readouts at each site.

• usesA background map with ridge strength 1 increased 20 to 500 ms SEEG forecast error outside a five-pulse response span by 18.6% at 86 selected sites in eight people

  This study retains the 86 fixed remote bipolar readout choices made from five early source good pulses. It does not repeat or alter the pair search.

• usesEight donor shapes reduced five-pulse SEEG forecast error versus eight cosines at 86 selected sites in eight patients; full waveforms had less error

  We retained its first-five-pulse response-energy readout choices and preserved its selection code. No readout was chosen from the new forecast errors.

• usesA normal prediction cutoff from five early controls gave 4.7 percent baseline calls in eight offline SEEG sessions

  We used the exact products, voltage windows, cohort rules, chronological pulse split, and source recipe. We reproduced the five-pulse pair choices and MAX outcomes before testing the new cutoffs.

• usesA map trained on other sites gave a 0.63% mean gain for 100–500 ms SEEG forecasts at 86 sites in eight patients with five calibration pulses per site and complete donor calibration

  Fixed five-pulse readout choices and selection rule.

• usesA delay search changed mean AUC from 0.9348 to 0.9363 under simulated independent discrete uniform ±9.77 ms timing errors in eight SEEG sessions

  This archive supplied the 983-sample bipolar voltage, candidate Gram matrices, source metadata, five-pulse readout choices, and source retrieval code. We checked 97 retained files against its manifest and computed new shifted voltage scores.

• usesEarly SEEG fits with a 9.77 ms shift limit increased later forecast error by 5.82% in eight patients

  This study supplied the five-pulse readout rule and the fixed readout choices preserved in the immediate input. The new test retains those choices. It does not select readouts from new results or add an independent cohort.

• usesA variance rule showed no clear 20–500 ms SEEG forecast gain at an equal pulse budget in eight offline sessions

  We kept its original first-five recording pair choices at all 86 sites through the immediate input. The choice indices are preserved. Later forecast errors did not change the selected readouts.

• usesOrdered frequency gains from seven other people increased normalized SEEG forecast error over one local gain with five fit pulses at 86 selected pairs

  We retained its first-five-pulse readout choices through the input study. All 86 selected stimulation/readout pairs were fixed for this comparison. We did not repeat the selection among candidate readouts.

More citing publications