Four separate thresholds gave mean background calls of 42.6% versus 16.7% for one joint threshold with fixed scores and random roles in eight SEEG sessions
We tested four response checks with public SEEG data from eight people and 86 stimulation sites. Each site used a fixed readout and mean templates from five early pulses. For each of 210 six-trace background subsets, all six target roles were tested with five controls. The equal-person mean call fraction was 42.6% with separate thresholds and 16.7% with one joint threshold. A counting proof bounds the joint fraction by one in six for fixed random roles. In chronological tests, background calls were 40.8% and 14.7%; after-pulse calls were 84.1% and 73.2%. These are score decisions, not verified neural responses. The rank proof does not establish coverage for chronological recordings. The package preserves selected voltage, source hashes, every decision, a proof, three figures, code, and repeat instructions.
SEEG · repeated thresholding · response monitoring · brain-computer interfaces · threshold calibration · random-role calibration · clinical neurophysiology
References
5- usesFive calibration pulses gave mean later signed template AUC of 0.939 compared with 0.859 for one pulse in eight SEEG sessions sci:sha256:1d2aa103275ad7400befec4c899740ede8f2eb59a09897bdc3f4d4e190e54418
Supplies the fixed eight-person cohort, 86 eligible sites, 886 candidate products, corrected event order, and source hash recipes. All products were rebuilt from the eight source MAT files and matched exactly.
- usesPair choice with five reused controls raised background calls under random roles in eight SEEG sessions sci:sha256:60c03226227669dc2eb0f9026c30b0a31e441915e9134103a22567d0c861be5a
Its fixed-role control design informed this counting test. This study adds four prefix checks while holding pair and templates fixed; it measures a different repeated-check effect.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
Source dataset; the analyzed files are identified by the recorded release, source URLs, and SHA-256 hashes.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesAn exact sign-flip test passed at 70 of 86 SEEG sites with six retained pulses and a 20–500 ms window in eight people from ds004696
Its finite-control rank test and repeated-check analysis informed the question about how much exact evidence a small calibration set can supply. This study uses a different pulse-sign test, a fixed within-site family, and a new six-pulse endpoint.