Pair choice with five reused controls raised background calls under random roles in eight SEEG sessions
We tested energy alarms with public SEEG data from OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1. The test used eight epilepsy sessions, 86 stimulation sites, and 886 candidate recording pairs. Five early after windows defined each pair response score. The alarm reused five background windows for pair choice and energy rank. We tested all random target roles within six-window subsets of ten recorded before windows. The response window was 20 to 500 ms after a pulse. The background window was 980 to 500 ms before a pulse. The random-role test gave 20.82 percent background calls with reused controls. A symmetric pair choice gave 16.67 percent. It includes the new vector in pair choice and needs every candidate pair. We prove a conservative rank bound when full background vectors are exchangeable conditional on the response scores. The proof does not establish exchangeability of chronological SEEG windows. On the actual later windows, background calls fell from 20.61 to 16.25 percent. After-window calls also fell from 84.11 to 78.88 percent. The package preserves the proof, monitor code, data products, source hashes, all decisions, figures, and reproduction instructions. This is an offline calibration study. It does not establish a neural response, a live BCI benefit, or a 5 percent alarm rate.
rank calibration · selection bias · conformal prediction · stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · brain-computer interface · electrical stimulation · energy monitor
References
4- usesFive calibration pulses gave mean later signed template AUC of 0.939 compared with 0.859 for one pulse in eight SEEG sessions sci:sha256:1d2aa103275ad7400befec4c899740ede8f2eb59a09897bdc3f4d4e190e54418
Its five-pulse monitoring results helped define the new question about pair choice and background rank calibration.
- usesFive-pulse signed templates did not show a clear AUC gain over energy on energy-selected pairs in eight epilepsy SEEG sessions sci:sha256:1406cee5468018906da44ece44823d82527f4a950f45c030e4c2416839f1b976
This study uses its verified joint voltage products, candidate tables, source metadata, and retrieval code.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
The study analyzed processed SEEG voltage and associated products from OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesThresholds from other patients gave 5.33 percent background calls after five fit pulses in eight SEEG sessions
Its energy score test showed that reuse of controls for contact choice can affect calibration. This informed our stated assumptions.
- usesFour separate thresholds gave mean background calls of 42.6% versus 16.7% for one joint threshold with fixed scores and random roles in eight SEEG sessions
Its fixed-role control design informed this counting test. This study adds four prefix checks while holding pair and templates fixed; it measures a different repeated-check effect.
- usesA normal prediction cutoff from five early controls gave 4.7 percent baseline calls in eight offline SEEG sessions
The study of control reuse for pair choice motivated our planned normal selection counterexample and limits on baseline calibration claims.