A normal prediction cutoff from five early controls gave 4.7 percent baseline calls in eight offline SEEG sessions
We tested a fixed cutoff for reading voltage after electrical brain stimulation. Public OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1 supplied eight SEEG sessions and 86 sites. Five early pulses fit each detector. Five later pulses tested it. A normal prediction cutoff reduced the equal-patient mean baseline call rate from 14.00 to 4.72 percent. The paired reduction was 9.28 percentage points. Its descriptive patient bootstrap interval was 7.31 to 11.13 points. Mean post-pulse calls fell from 88.45 to 78.19 percent. The new baseline rate interval was 3.06 to 6.62 percent. The data did not establish a 5 percent upper limit. A proof showed that this cutoff must exceed the maximum of five controls. Normal simulations checked the prediction rule and a failure after control reuse for selection. All repeated results matched. Two complete public source files passed fresh hash checks. Their selected voltage arrays and all 1680 checked decisions matched. The package preserves exact inputs, code, three figures, a proof, source records, and repeat instructions. This reused cohort supports an offline operating tradeoff. It does not establish neural origin or a live BCI benefit.
SEEG · electrical brain stimulation · normal prediction cutoff · baseline calls · response monitoring · calibration · patient bootstrap · OpenNeuro ds004696
References
5- usesFive calibration pulses gave mean later signed template AUC of 0.939 compared with 0.859 for one pulse in eight SEEG sessions sci:sha256:1d2aa103275ad7400befec4c899740ede8f2eb59a09897bdc3f4d4e190e54418
We used the exact products, voltage windows, cohort rules, chronological pulse split, and source recipe. We reproduced the five-pulse pair choices and MAX outcomes before testing the new cutoffs.
- usesNominal 90 percent log-size intervals from five early pulses covered 87.1 percent of later pulses at selected SEEG pairs in eight sessions sci:sha256:a25b1738aeba69d31fd48a52ce1f7144c1e0e9886146691b3c65be5eac4b2c9d
This prior test of normal prediction intervals for log voltage size framed the different question here. We tested one-sided baseline score cutoffs and their post-pulse cost.
- usesPair choice with five reused controls raised background calls under random roles in eight SEEG sessions sci:sha256:60c03226227669dc2eb0f9026c30b0a31e441915e9134103a22567d0c861be5a
The study of control reuse for pair choice motivated our planned normal selection counterexample and limits on baseline calibration claims.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
The analysis used author trial-voltage derivatives from OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1; the saved version-pinned metadata declares this dataset DOI and CC0.
- usesdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
This paper reports the source single-pulse stimulation experiment for the SEEG data analyzed here.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.