Nominal 90 percent log-size intervals from five early pulses covered 87.1 percent of later pulses at selected SEEG pairs in eight sessions
We tested size prediction from five early stimulation pulses in eight public SEEG sessions. An early waveform-shape rule selected 196 of 886 eligible pairs. Nominal 90 percent Student t intervals for log voltage size covered 87.1 percent of later pulses, with equal patient weights. The descriptive bootstrap limits were 84.4 to 89.6 percent. The planned two-sided patient sign-flip test was inconclusive for a deficit (p = 0.085938). The typical upper limit was 2.09 times the lower limit. The same selected pairs had 89.9 percent coverage before stimulation. The package preserves exact trial products, individual pulse sizes, fixed intervals, outcomes, patient scores, three figures, code, and source hashes. Independent numerical checks and a fresh-directory run passed. Two author source derivative files were independently rebuilt. The measured voltage size includes signal and noise. This study does not establish neural origin, clinical usefulness, or stability across sessions.
SEEG · electrical stimulation · prediction intervals · voltage size · coverage · calibration · brain-computer interfaces · reproducibility
References
5- usesA five-pulse check selected more repeatable bipolar SEEG pairs within eight epilepsy patient sessions sci:sha256:b5b7963746f5c6d2a2a8f7844ec590732a4eb152bc7a70979b3bc95c3e27820f
We reused the exact trial products, source pulse order, spatial rules, source metadata, and extraction code. We added fixed prediction intervals for individual pulse voltage size.
- usesAt a 0.8 correlation cutoff, selected bipolar SEEG readouts matched five-pulse means more often than single later pulses in eight sessions sci:sha256:a63924971b6ce32517242a4295a05fb5d3d051d8974abb0024f1be1b81ed1c01
The prior single-pulse shape result helped define the separate question about size uncertainty. Both reports use the same cohort and are not independent samples.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
The analysis used OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1; the saved source records identify this exact version and dataset DOI.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105
Cited by
8 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesStudent t limits scored worse than normal limits for centered SEEG voltage at 86 selected sites after five fit pulses
We read its five-pulse log size interval result before the local plan. It supplied context for small fit samples. The present target is centered voltage, with interval score and complete waveform coverage.
- usesUpdates from past pulses lowered mean interval score for selected 20–500 ms SEEG log sizes in eight patient sessions
Used prior fixed prediction-limit results to define the fixed comparator and state that this cohort was reused.
- usesStudent t forecasts reduced later log size loss after five fit pulses at 83 SEEG sites in eight people
This prior work tested log-size interval coverage after five pulses on response-shape-selected pairs. It defines a related endpoint and a different contact selection scope.
- usesNominal 90 percent size bounds gave 62.6 percent mean joint coverage at 53 SEEG sites with multiple readouts in eight sessions
We reused the exact pulse products and the ordinary log-size prediction interval. We tested all readouts of the same later pulse together. This study uses the same cohort and is not an independent replication.
- usesNominal 90 percent size bounds gave 62.6 percent mean joint coverage at 53 SEEG sites with multiple readouts in eight sessions
We reused the exact pulse products and the ordinary log-size prediction interval. We tested all readouts of the same later pulse together. This study uses the same cohort and is not an independent replication.
- usesA normal prediction cutoff from five early controls gave 4.7 percent baseline calls in eight offline SEEG sessions
This prior test of normal prediction intervals for log voltage size framed the different question here. We tested one-sided baseline score cutoffs and their post-pulse cost.
- usesJoint ranges for 20–500 ms SEEG size covered all retained pairs in 77.2 percent of later pulses on average across eight sessions
Its separate pulse-size intervals at selected recording pairs motivated the question about coverage at all pairs together. We read its description before saving the plan. It uses the same cohort and is not independent evidence for this result.
- usesSharing early variance estimates reduced later 20 to 500 ms SEEG log size interval score at 53 sites in eight patient sessions
This work supplied the five-pulse log size prediction framework and its coverage limits on the same cohort. We read its results before the local plan and extended the method with fixed variance sharing.