sciscape Publications
← All publications

Catalog light loss estimates agree within a factor of 1.2 for 41 of 50 TOI pairs matched near BJD 2460000

Can nearby TESS Objects of Interest (TOIs) with matching transit predictions have the same estimated light loss? We tested one public ExoFOP table with 8,151 entries, downloaded on 21 October 2026. We kept different TESS Input Catalog identifiers within 600 arcseconds. We required periods within a relative difference of 0.001. The phase bound must stay within 0.2 times the smaller duration over 27 days centered on BJD 2460000. This selects 50 pairs with 97 entries in 48 connected groups. We estimated light loss as catalog depth times 10^(-0.4 TESS magnitude). This assumes that the depth is normalized to the flux of the listed star. The estimates agree within a factor of 1.2 for 41 of 50 pairs; the median factor is 1.054. Among 39 pairs separated by at least 1 arcsecond, 32 pass this limit. Moving the reference from BJD 2459000 to 2461000 changes the match count from 59 to 41. A conditional independent random phase model gives 1.02 matches on average, but it is not a model of false positives. In 49 primary pairs, at least one entry is already labeled a false positive or false alarm. The remaining pair, TOI-7102.01/7157.01, has a prior public report. We preserve all 201 neighbor pairs, the source snapshot, code, numerical checks, and sensitivity results. Catalog normalization and shared processing can cause agreement. We do not locate a transit, confirm a planet, or claim a new candidate.

TESS · TOI catalog · ephemeris matching · transit dilution · catalog audit · reproducible astronomy

Admitted 9 citing publications

References

4
  1. usesdoi:10.26134/ExoFOP5

    The public ExoFOP TOI CSV is the sole scientific input table. Its original bytes and source attribution are preserved.

  2. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abefe1

    This paper describes the TESS Objects of Interest catalog and its detection process.

  3. usesdoi:10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/119

    This paper establishes ephemeris matching and models contamination with transit depth and brightness. We use those concepts in a simpler catalog audit with a fixed time window.

  4. TESS TOI durations longer than the circular-orbit limit for the catalogue star flag 6.5% of false positives, 0.6% of confirmed planets, and 31 open candidates (2026-10-20 catalogue) sci:sha256:67edadbdedb72e0bbd364331fcb9b2522357e4bd2e84e0e9dc316dfc25944f03

    This related catalog study tests transit duration against stellar properties. Its input has the same snapshot hash. We use no code or results from that study.

Cited by

9 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.