Symmetric infrared fits place the March 2026 WASP-12 b transit 91 to 118 seconds before a 2020–2023 TESS constant-period forecast
We test the 10 March 2026 WASP-12 b JWST transit against clocks fit only to 117 TESS times from 2020 to 2023. We use public NIRSpec PRISM data from program 5924. The original broad-band fit fails quality checks. We then use the fixed 3.8–5.0 micrometre band as an exploratory choice. A symmetric transit with a quadratic time baseline gives BJD TDB 2461109.87605008. Residual-block refits give a conditional error of 12.9 s. Eleven tested long-wavelength fits span 26.5 s. All put the center 91.0 to 117.5 s before the constant-period forecast. This range measures model sensitivity, not confidence. The main center is 114.8 s early, with an 18.5 s comparison error under independent TESS timing errors. A fixed published shrinking-period clock reduces the discrepancy to 41.2 s. Assumed shared sector offsets of 30 s increase the comparison error to 42.7 s. The first delivered integration midpoint precedes the exposure header by 4.575 s. A separate segment check confirms the delivered time table but does not resolve that discrepancy. The adopted clock floor does not cover all possible product timestamp errors. We publish reduced data, source code, all fit checks, and a raw-data reproduction. The result supplies a new event test of specified clocks. It does not establish a new decay rate or a physical cause.
WASP-12 b · JWST · TESS · transit timing · orbital decay · NIRSpec PRISM · model sensitivity · public data · reproducible research
References
7- usesShared training uncertainty limits the constant-period mean offset to 1.8 standard errors for 35 WASP-12 b TESS transits assuming fixed shapes and independent timing errors sci:sha256:9b822345ee019e5d88bd8be80f46ea9ede25948289d0c33e13191cc943a7cc04
We reuse its 117 accepted 120 s cadence TESS transit times and seven extraction choices. We preserve the complete signed source.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac5680
We fix the shrinking-period coefficient at its published value and test its stated error.
- doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd178
- doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae4c86
- usesdoi:10.1086/683602
We use the batman symmetric transit model.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad8eb1
The JWST clock study guides the conditional clock error floor. It does not bound all product timestamp errors.
- usesdoi:10.17909/t9-nmc8-f686
The source timing study uses this TESS data collection.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesSymmetric fits to one July 2025 WASP-103 b JWST transit give a 23-second difference between two infrared bands
This study informed the fixed wavelength bands and the explicit comparison of spectral times, segment integration times, and exposure headers. The present code is independent.
- usesOne sample accounts for the 4.15 percent flux contrast in the JWST 1.2–1.8 micrometre sum with equal weights for WASP-12 b on 10 March 2026
This source reports the unexplained two-state band. We reuse its exact archive version, spectral product, validity rule, time reference, and long-wavelength fit geometry. We adapt its public extraction and fetch code.