The top 10 percent of cross-shaft alpha correlation edges agreed more across time than across recorded and local references in two resting SEEG recordings
We tested whether alpha correlation graphs repeat across time but change with the reference. We used both resting SEEG recordings in OpenNeuro ds005670 version 1.0.0. The methods used recorded, common average, and local Laplacian references. We used the same contact anchors, different-shaft pairs, and twelve 30-second intervals for all methods. We compared the strongest 10 percent of pairs. sub-01: recorded temporal Dice 0.921, local temporal Dice 0.457, recorded/local Dice 0.104. sub-02: recorded temporal Dice 0.908, local temporal Dice 0.485, recorded/local Dice 0.198. In both recordings, temporal overlap exceeded recorded/local reference overlap. The package includes interval weights, contact audits, source hashes, retrieval code, and numerical checks. The evidence is limited to these contacts, intervals, and voltage-correlation graphs. It does not identify the true neural graph or the best reference.
stereo-electroencephalography · SEEG · reference method · alpha band · correlation graph · temporal agreement · Dice overlap · intracranial EEG
References
3- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005670.v1.0.0
Both resting SEEG recordings in this exact dataset version were analyzed; the source declares CC0.
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.020
- doi:10.1093/braincomms%2Ffcae165
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesTop 10 percent beta imaginary coherency graphs had mean Dice agreement of 0.36 across recorded and common average references in 19 SEEG records
Uses the exact graph-selection and Dice rules, and the comparison with equal-duration time windows, as design context. No signals, code, or weights are reused. The dataset, band, edge measure, and reference comparison differ.
- usesMedian 30–80 Hz exponents increased with bipolar span from one to four contact steps in two 120-second resting SEEG records
Its earlier reference and time comparison in this cohort informed the question. We selected a different outcome: spectral exponent change with matched bipolar contact spans. We did not use its feature arrays.