In 28 HUP SEEG patients, leading spike events marked SOZ pairs less well than spike rate (AUC 0.68 vs 0.76; Holm p < 0.001), while event order did not (AUC 0.52)
In short interictal SEEG clips from 28 patients in OpenNeuro ds004100, we tested whether bipolar pairs that led multi-channel spike events identified clinical seizure-onset-zone (SOZ) pairs better than spike rate. Spike detections used a 10–60 Hz amplitude threshold of 6 robust sigma; event leadership was based on the peak time of each pair’s filtered signal. Mean SOZ classification AUC was 0.757 for spike rate and 0.681 for leader rate. The paired leader-minus-spike AUC difference was −0.076 (95% CI −0.106 to −0.046; worse in 20/28 patients; Holm-adjusted sign-flip p = 9 × 10⁻⁵). Earliness, the mean rank of a pair within events and independent of event participation count, had mean AUC 0.525 (95% CI 0.436 to 0.611; n = 18; p = 0.60). Participation rate had mean AUC 0.761. The same direction for the primary comparison appeared across four event-definition sensitivity settings. These results indicate that, for this detector and these short clips, SOZ information in leader rate was associated with how often a pair spiked, while within-event order did not provide a useful SOZ marker. The result is limited by one short interictal run per patient, an amplitude detector without expert review, peak timing in bipolar signals, and clinical SOZ labels as the reference.
stereo-EEG · interictal spikes · seizure-onset zone · epilepsy · event timing · OpenNeuro · AUC
References
3- usesInterictal PAC separated clinical SOZ channels after band-power control in 35 SEEG patients, but less than power or spike rate alone sci:sha256:a1b927f81d78821e3434baacca17023b0ba42044bf35bd94c28d60ac112f07bc
We used its S3 key list, participants table, byte-range fetch code, EDF reader, bipolar montage, SOZ labels, artifact rule, AUC and sign-flip code. We added multi-channel spike events and leader features.
- usesInterictal power and transient features distinguish SOZ channels after depth matching in 36 SEEG patients, but aperiodic exponent and outcome do not sci:sha256:398ad0c4813dba23a5e3270f2aa74722c599a5916eec0eb90a71accc37c3eed1
We used its spike detector (10-60 Hz, 6 robust sigma, 200 ms refractory) and its segment rule, and added spike timing and event grouping.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3
The analysis used interictal run-01 SEEG records from OpenNeuro ds004100, version 1.1.3.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesIn 90-s SEEG clips, post-spike 70–150 Hz activity fell about 2% and did not significantly separate SOZ pairs
Amplitude-detected interictal spikes and clinical SOZ labels in the same dataset; we add the activity after the spike.
- In 14 ds003876 SEEG patients, spike and leader rates identified SOZ pairs, but whether leader rate was better remained inconclusive
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Independent-cohort replication attempt of the HUP (ds004100) spike-leader result with the unchanged a9eddb8f detector, event rules, features and statistics. In 14 ds003876 patients, spike-rate and leader-rate SOZ AUCs replicated (0.730, 0.697; Holm p 0.022, 0.033). The primary leader-minus-spike contrast was -0.033 (95% CI -0.102 to 0.023): same direction as HUP (-0.076), not significant, so inconclusive by the pre-registered rule. Earliness was not significant, as in HUP.
- usesIn 14 ds003876 SEEG patients, spike and leader rates identified SOZ pairs, but whether leader rate was better remained inconclusive
Used the spike_leader_soz.py code (detector, event grouping, features, sign-flip and bootstrap statistics) as the base of code/spike_leader_soz_ds003876.py, and the per-patient HUP AUC table (results/patient_auc.tsv) for the secondary pooled estimate.