Fixed window tests did not confirm shared variance reduction in 7 iEEG and 8 fMRI patients after stimulation of the amygdala region
We tested whether amygdala-region stimulation reduces residual signal variance in two separate human cohorts. Four iEEG patients supplied development. Fixed tests used 7 other iEEG patients and 8 fMRI patients with different IDs. Electrical variance was measured across repeated pulses at 70–200 ms. BOLD variance was measured in matched 18 s ON and OFF windows after removal of a flexible mean cycle response, motion and drift. Patients were the test units. The geometric summaries of patient ratios were 1.0246 and 0.8949. Their pointwise 95% person t intervals were [0.9817, 1.0695] and [0.7786, 1.0286]. Variance fell in 2/7 and 5/8 patients. Shared decrease, shared increase and a development-led 80% retention claim all failed Holm correction. This does not establish absent neural quenching or a causal modality difference. A terminal-train input repair followed the first fMRI result; its unchanged output and the repair are preserved. Separate SVD fits checked all primary BOLD parcel scores. The package gives independent code, new aggregate data, all outcomes, source versions and terms, fixed plans, figures, audits and repeat steps. Original epochs, coordinates and licensed BOLD time series remain external. Sparse clinical sampling, different pulse protocols and sensing scales, finite repeats, source processing, motion and signal loss limit scope. Cross-modal generalization was not established.
human neuroscience · intracranial EEG · functional MRI · electrical stimulation · neural variability · reproducibility
References
12- doi:10.1038/nn.2501
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007983
- usesIn 8 SEEG subjects, key presses did not reduce 70–150 Hz variability in the 10 most responsive channels sci:sha256:ff1babc1364c64aaefef71e1835f554e26d587b7b38c0bd1bb780f54efcc3cdb
Its human variability test motivates the question and the use of patient summaries. We reuse no source inputs or code.
- usesGain fits with shifts up to 19.5 ms left 1.93 times the matched control variance in 59 to 460 ms SEEG at 86 selected sites in eight people sci:sha256:e12c7736723be38135302ccdbf9a63fa33886bbb1b8b5746fa0c9430d88dfb38
Its response-gain and timing limits motivate the matched gain-projection check and the interpretation of residual variance. Our implementation and inputs are separate.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41467-022-32644-y
Source electrical experiment, source workbook and amygdala run metadata.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41467-022-33286-w
Corrected supplementary patient tables supply the source stimulation-side metadata.
- usesdoi:10.17605/OSF.IO/DNGV5
Released electrical trial epochs and contact coordinates; file version 1 and content hashes are recorded.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41597-020-00595-y
Source es-fMRI experiment and data descriptor.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds002799.v1.0.4
Pinned fMRI derivative surfaces, event files, confounds and source QC views.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.010
Destrieux cortical atlas for contact assignment and parcel summaries.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4
Released fMRIPrep 1.5.1rc1 preprocessing; we do not rerun it.
- doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1295326
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesFixed tests did not confirm a shared association between baseline persistence and late response energy in 9 iEEG and 6 fMRI patients
We adapt its MIT source retrieval, streaming MATLAB reader, atlas geometry and surface extraction code, and reuse its public source inventory and QC metadata. The endpoint and new source measurements differ.