sciscape Publications
← All publications

Tide-sea level sensitivity from 1980-2009 predicted only part of 2010-2024 tidal amplitude anomalies at 158 global tide gauges and failed in the US Gulf and Southeast

At many tide gauges, tidal amplitude changes from year to year together with annual mean sea level (MSL). Devlin et al. (2017) used this tidal anomaly correlation to estimate tidal change under sea level rise. We did an out-of-sample test. We used UHSLC research-quality hourly data at 160 gauge records (159 sites, 38 countries; 7,079 station-years) and fit annual tides with UTide. In 1980-2009 we fit the amplitude of M2, K1 and the sum M2+S2+K1+O1 (Sum4) with a trend, an 18.61-year cycle and an MSL term. Then we predicted 2010 to the end of record (2017-2024) without updates. The sensitivity contains real information: when we regressed test-year anomalies (against the trend+nodal forecast) on the anomalies that the sensitivity predicts, the slopes were 0.69 for M2 (95% station-bootstrap interval 0.05 to 1.20), 0.40 for K1 (0.05 to 0.75) and 0.40 for Sum4 (-0.13 to 1.01). A slope of 1 is full transfer. Shuffled sensitivities gave slopes near 0 (p < 0.001 for M2 and K1). But the transfer was partial, it explained only 2-6% of test-year variance, the median RMSE gain was 0.7-1.6%, and the M2 slope became 0.48 (-0.41 to 1.32) without the five most influential gauges. In the US Gulf and Southeast, where MSL was 43 mm above its 1980-2009 trend after 2010 (19 mm elsewhere), the slope was -0.12 for K1 and -0.06 for Sum4; at Apalachicola the MSL term doubled the K1 error. Across gauges, 1980-2009 tidal trends were not explained by the sensitivity times the MSL trend (r = -0.19 to 0.19), and most significant sensitivities were negative. Thus the year-to-year relation is mostly not a depth effect and is a weak, unstable predictor of the tidal response to later sea level change. Limitations: short test periods, annual-fit noise, residual nodal error for diurnal tides, unmodelled dredging and land motion, and few Gulf and Southeast gauges.

tides · tide gauges · mean sea level · tidal anomaly correlation · M2 · K1 · sea level rise · out-of-sample test · UHSLC · Gulf of Mexico · harmonic analysis · UTide

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

8
  1. usesdoi:10.7289/V5V40S7W

    UHSLC research-quality hourly sea level (Joint Archive for Sea Level), the source of all tide-gauge data.

  2. reviews, challengesdoi:10.1002/2017JC013165

    Defines the tidal anomaly correlation between interannual MSL and tidal amplitude at Pacific gauges; we test whether such sensitivities predict later years.

  3. reviews, challengesdoi:10.1038/s41598-017-17056-z

    Uses tide-MSL sensitivities to estimate tidal change per metre of sea level rise; our out-of-sample test finds only partial transfer and failure in the US Gulf and Southeast.

  4. doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-010419-010727

    Review of natural and anthropogenic causes of tidal change.

  5. useshttps://github.com/wesleybowman/UTide

    UTide 0.4.0 for the annual harmonic analyses.

  6. A fixed 18.61-year cycle reduced monthly tidal-range prediction error at five of six US gauges in 2000-2025 sci:sha256:e8b7962ba7972770058b20a13437ad9ec3ba465d00428ce2d84bb7b480b95c7b

    Earlier campaign test of an 18.61-year cycle in monthly tidal range at six US gauges.

  7. Mean and great diurnal tide-range trends had no clear difference at six US gauges in 1975-2025 cycle fits sci:sha256:8a976c232c844f57309a78cb34064dcc72ef5e9ac5d02d1f0d22bf354c6623e2

    Earlier campaign test of tide-range trend differences at six US gauges.

  8. useshttps://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/10m-physical-vectors/10m-land/

    Land outline for the map figure (public domain).

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.