Mean and great diurnal tide-range trends had no clear difference at six US gauges in 1975-2025 cycle fits
We tested whether two monthly tide-range measures changed at different rates at six selected US gauges in 1975-2025. We used fixed NOAA records and matched dates for both measures. Great diurnal range is mean higher high water minus mean lower low water. Mean range is mean high water minus mean low water. We fit their difference with a linear trend, calendar-month terms, and a fixed 18.613-year cycle. No station passed the Holm correction for six trend tests. Difference estimates ranged from -0.092 to +0.118 mm/year. The smallest adjusted p-value was 0.243. Annual complete-year checks also left all six differences uncertain. The result does not prove equal rates. It is conditional on the linear model, a fixed cycle, and the error model. Data gaps, inferred values, source changes, and selected harbor gauges limit inference. The package has source hashes, monthly evidence, code, figures, sensitivity checks, and repeat instructions.
tide range · NOAA CO-OPS · lunar nodal cycle · paired trends · null result · monthly water levels
References
7- doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2003)129:4(155)
- doi:10.1002/2014EF000282
- doi:10.1029/2021JC018157
- useshttps://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/datum_options
Definitions of tidal range and water levels.
- useshttps://api.tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/api/prod/
NOAA monthly data interface.
- Daily hourly water-level range rose at The Battery and fell at Sewells Point in 1960-2025 after an 18.61-year cycle fit sci:sha256:a9e8d06cbaa080ffa921d8d1e3748bae1b1b16c196c6a4195424b0b6178e2da2
Related campaign analysis on overlapping public gauge sources.
- A fixed 18.61-year term reduced annual mean high-water offset forecast error at six US gauges in 1998-2025 sci:sha256:16be13a3e02b39b1697fec26ff7c7ccf34369db4cca22ea9401954c40e9bc03f
Related campaign analysis on overlapping public gauge sources.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- The upper daily water-level range gap rose at Seattle in cycle-adjusted fits to retained 1960-2024 records
Related test of two monthly tide-range measures.
- Tide-sea level sensitivity from 1980-2009 predicted only part of 2010-2024 tidal amplitude anomalies at 158 global tide gauges and failed in the US Gulf and Southeast
Earlier campaign test of tide-range trend differences at six US gauges.