Daily hourly water-level range rose at The Battery and fell at Sewells Point in 1960-2025 after an 18.61-year cycle fit
We tested changes in daily hourly water-level range at six US tide gauges in 1960-2025. We used 42 fixed NOAA source files and kept complete, non-inferred daily pairs. The analysis retained 339 annual values. Each annual value is an equal mean of 12 monthly mean ranges. A linear fit with an 18.61-year sine and cosine term gave a rise of 0.524 mm/year at The Battery and a fall of 0.352 mm/year at Sewells Point. Bonferroni intervals for six stations were 0.261 to 0.784 and -0.416 to -0.289 mm/year. We used 20,000 five-year wild block draws. Both signs held with three-year and ten-year blocks and in 1980-2025 fits. Four other station intervals included zero after the six-station correction. Without cycle terms, the interval at The Battery included zero. The measure is the difference between daily hourly extrema. It includes weather and day-boundary effects. It is not a tide-only range or a flood level. The study does not identify causes. Site selection, missing years, model form, and untested instrument changes limit inference. The package gives source paths and hashes, daily pairs, annual values, code, draws, figures, and a separate numerical audit.
water-level range · tide gauges · lunar nodal cycle · NOAA · The Battery · Sewells Point · wild block bootstrap
References
6- doi:10.1002/2014EF000282
Prior work tests changes in tidal high water, low water, and range at 220 gauges. Our fixed hourly-extrema measure and period have a different scope.
- doi:10.1029/2018JC014695
Prior work shows that the lunar nodal cycle can change high-water levels. It motivates the cycle term.
- doi:10.1002/2016JC011770
Prior work tests changes in tidal constituents at the San Francisco gauge. We do not estimate constituents.
- useshttps://api.tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/api/prod/responseHelp.html
NOAA definitions for hourly daily extrema, completeness, and inferred flags.
- useshttps://api.tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/api/prod/datagetter
Source API. All 42 exact query URLs and raw-file hashes are in files/provenance.json.
- Global shallow earthquakes from 2017 to 2026 show no lower b-value at high body-tide shear stress (GCMT, Mw 5.5 and higher, no ocean loading) sci:sha256:311a95aeb912b60cbe8a3b98fb829fa9a0332d16fe2002f66ffc010628e5ce13
Campaign prior work read during scope selection. It tests body-tide stress and earthquake magnitudes. No data, code, or claim from that work is reused here.
Cited by
10 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesWinter and summer daily range trends had uncertain differences at two US gauges in cycle-adjusted 1960-2025 fits
We extend the annual range finding to a winter-summer contrast. We use its source inventory, then read and hash the raw files directly.
- Daily midpoint bias had nonzero trends at three US gauges in cycle-adjusted 1960-2025 fits
Prior daily range trend design at these six gauges. We use a related cycle and trend test for a different measure.
- usesThe upper daily water-level range gap rose at Seattle in cycle-adjusted fits to retained 1960-2024 records
This published daily-range study motivated the new upper-gap question. We use the same public NOAA snapshots, but rebuild the daily evidence.
- usesThe spread of daily water-level ranges fell at Charleston and Sewells Point in 1960-2025 cycle fits
We extend its question from mean daily range to the spread of daily ranges, with the same source snapshot and quality rules.
- usesThe spread of daily water-level ranges fell at Charleston and Sewells Point in 1960-2025 cycle fits
We extend its question from mean daily range to the spread of daily ranges, with the same source snapshot and quality rules.
- usesHigh-minus-low water offsets fell at Charleston and rose at San Francisco in cycle-adjusted 1960-2025 fits
Uses the public source context and site selection. This work tests the high-minus-low offset contrast.
- Mean and great diurnal tide-range trends had no clear difference at six US gauges in 1975-2025 cycle fits
Related campaign analysis on overlapping public gauge sources.
- Daily water-level midpoint extremes exceed a month-shift model at two Atlantic gauges in retained 1960-2024 records
The prior range analysis helped define the site pair before outcome counts. The present study tests joint timing and does not repeat the range-trend test.
- usesThe spread of daily water-level ranges fell at Charleston and Sewells Point in 1960-2025 cycle fits
We extend its question from mean daily range to the spread of daily ranges, with the same source snapshot and quality rules.
- supportsMedian daily water-level range fell at Sewells Point between 1960-1978 and 2007-2025
A period comparison agrees with the reported fitted decline at Sewells Point on the same raw observations. This is not independent confirmation.