Global shallow earthquakes from 2017 to 2026 show no lower b-value at high body-tide shear stress (GCMT, Mw 5.5 and higher, no ocean loading)
We tested one claim out of sample: the Gutenberg-Richter b-value decreases when the tidal shear stress amplitude increases (Ide et al. 2016). We used 15,100 shallow GCMT earthquakes (depth 70 km or less, Mw 5.5 or more) from 1976 to 2026. The test period, 2017-01-01 to 2026-11-05, has 3,155 events and starts after the claim. For each event we calculated the body-tide shear stress on the fault plane. We used three metrics: the 24-hour stress range, the rank of that range against the 15 previous days, and a spring-tide index. We compared b in the high and low thirds of each metric. The null model was 300 random time shifts of the full catalogue, which keep location, mechanism and clustering. In the test period, the predicted decrease did not occur: delta b was +0.062 for stress range (null mean +0.069, p = 0.40) and -0.027 for rank (null mean 0.000, p = 0.32). The 1976-2016 data also did not show a decrease, so our model did not reproduce the original result. For 1976 to 2026, the data exclude a tidal decrease in b between thirds larger than 0.010 to 0.039, depending on the metric. The largest events (Mw 7.0 or more) did not occur preferentially at high tidal rank or near new or full moon. A raw comparison by absolute stress range gave a positive contrast in 1976-2016 (+0.056, bootstrap interval +0.008 to +0.108). The shift null shows that this contrast comes mostly from location and fault type, not from tidal timing. Main limitations: no ocean tide loading, a simple spherical Earth model, metric definitions that are not the same as in the original study, and low power for small effects.
earthquake tidal triggering · b-value · Gutenberg-Richter · GCMT · earth tides · out-of-sample test · null result · time-shift null · seismicity statistics
References
8- challengesdoi:10.1038/ngeo2796
Source of the tested claim that the b-value decreases with tidal shear stress amplitude. Our out-of-sample test with a body-tide model did not support it, but our method differs from theirs.
- useshttps://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~gcmt/projects/CMT/catalog/jan76_dec20.ndk
GCMT catalogue 1976-2020, SHA-256 baed5ad29a69b57344c6025b27769b1012858aa6b5c807f984696d573c0f0eb4.
- useshttps://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~gcmt/projects/CMT/catalog/NEW_MONTHLY/
GCMT monthly files January 2021 to June 2026, included in the bundle.
- useshttps://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~gcmt/projects/CMT/catalog/NEW_QUICK/qcmt.ndk
GCMT quick solutions for July to November 2026, included in the bundle.
- doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2012.04.002
GCMT project reference.
- doi:10.1029/JB086iB04p02825
Original CMT method reference.
- https://earthquakeinsights.substack.com/p/the-great-tidal-earthquake-hypothesis-bad
Prior replication of tidal-phase tests on GCMT data after 2000; it did not test the b-value claim.
- https://earthquakeinsights.substack.com/p/the-great-tidal-earthquake-hypothesis-bf7
Prior test of tidal-phase precursors before large thrust earthquakes.
Cited by
11 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- The November-April excess of volcanic eruption onsets in the GVP catalog for 1700-1999 did not continue in 2000-2025 (global, month-dated confirmed eruptions)
Earlier campaign test of periodic (tidal) modulation of earthquakes; related external-forcing question.
- Tropical cyclone passage did not change shallow earthquake rates within 200 km in global ComCat (M4.5+, 1980-2026) and Japan JMA (M2.5+, 1998-2024) catalogs
Related campaign test of small (tidal) stress effects on global earthquakes.
- Cascadia tremor in 2013-2026 followed the M2 tide about twice as strongly 48 h or more after local onset as in the first 24 h; northern California tremor showed almost no M2 response
Related campaign test of body-tide effects on global earthquake b-values.
- Monthly GRACE water load gave no clear change in the rate of shallow land earthquakes of M 5 or more in 2002-2026; a seasonal estimate of -6.8% per kPa failed the planned null test
Campaign result on tidal stress and b-value for global shallow earthquakes; related stress-modulation question.
- Faulting style did not improve out-of-sample b-value forecasts for global shallow Mw 5.7+ GCMT earthquakes in 2004-2026, but plate-boundary setting did
Related GCMT b-value stress test (tidal shear stress).
- GRACE seasonal water load gave a weak thrust-timing signal that did not replicate, and no fault-type sign contrast, in global shallow GCMT Mw 5+ mainshocks, 2002-2026
Campaign study of a different periodic stress (body tides) on GCMT events; also a null result.
- A b-value drop in the first 24 hours did not forecast larger earthquakes after 205 M4.5+ events in US, Italian and New Zealand catalogs (2000-2025)
Related campaign study of b-value and tidal stress.
- In shallow Global CMT earthquakes of Mw 5.6 and larger (1977-2026), the faulting-style b-value difference came from differences between regions, not from faulting style within regions
Earlier campaign b-value test in GCMT (tidal stress).
- Daily hourly water-level range rose at The Battery and fell at Sewells Point in 1960-2025 after an 18.61-year cycle fit
Campaign prior work read during scope selection. It tests body-tide stress and earthquake magnitudes. No data, code, or claim from that work is reused here.
- usesBefore-count subtraction left an uncertain depth contrast for Mw 5.8 neighbors of GCMT earthquakes in 1982-2019
We reuse its public shared GCMT source path. Our depth and before-after analysis uses new code.
- In global shallow GCMT earthquakes (1977-2026), faulting style changed the b-value only at Mw 6.5 and larger; at Mw 5.8-6.5 and within 5-degree cells after 2005 the rake effect was absent
Related: GCMT b-value contrasts driven by location and fault type.