sciscape Publications
← All publications

In global shallow GCMT earthquakes (1977-2026), faulting style changed the b-value only at Mw 6.5 and larger; at Mw 5.8-6.5 and within 5-degree cells after 2005 the rake effect was absent

We tested the claim that the Gutenberg-Richter b-value depends on faulting style (Schorlemmer et al. 2005: normal highest, thrust lowest). We used shallow (centroid depth 50 km or less) Global CMT earthquakes of Mw 5.8 and larger. We fitted on 1977-2004 (n = 3,687) and tested on 2005 to June 2026 (n = 3,320). We used an exponential magnitude likelihood with ln b = alpha + gamma sin(rake), 5-degree cell fixed effects and a cluster bootstrap. Globally, gamma stayed negative but became half as large: -0.117 (95% CI -0.176 to -0.064), then -0.061 (-0.110 to -0.006). After 2005, normal b was not clearly higher than thrust b. Within 5-degree cells, gamma was -0.070 (-0.157 to +0.006), then +0.022 (-0.038 to +0.092). For 5.8 <= Mw < 6.5, the rake slope was zero or positive in both periods. For Mw 6.5 and larger (post hoc), gamma was -0.16 in both periods, globally and within cells (intervals exclude 0). Thrust b was 0.97 and 0.87; strike-slip b was 1.23 and 1.12. Class b-values fitted on 1977-2004 did not improve the 2005-2026 magnitude likelihood (+0.8 millinats per event, -1.8 to +3.4). Cell b-values did improve it (+7.0, +3.2 to +11.2), and the faulting class added nothing beyond the cell b-values. Thus the faulting-style effect is in the large-event tail and is not a general change of slope. This agrees with rupture-width saturation more than with a stress control that acts at all magnitudes, but we did not test the mechanism. Limitations: the GCMT method changed in 2004, the Mw 6.5 split is post hoc, and the within-cell intervals are wide.

b-value · Gutenberg-Richter · faulting style · rake · Global CMT · stress meter · out-of-sample test · replication · earthquake magnitude distribution · seismic hazard

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

12
  1. challengesdoi:10.1038/nature04094

    We test its faulting-style b-value claim out of sample and within locations; it holds only for Mw 6.5 and larger.

  2. reviewsdoi:10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115791

    Global faulting-style b-value model b ~ -sin(rake) that we test.

  3. supportsdoi:10.1029/2019GL083997

    We also find b decreasing with depth within cells.

  4. doi:10.1785/0120030107

    Plate-boundary class differences in corner magnitude.

  5. doi:10.1038/355071a0

    Magnitude-dependent change of b at rupture-width saturation.

  6. usesdoi:10.1785/BSSA0640051363

    Gardner-Knopoff declustering windows.

  7. usesdoi:10.1029/JB086iB04p02825

    GCMT method and catalogue citation.

  8. usesdoi:10.1016/j.pepi.2012.04.002

    GCMT catalogue citation and the 2004 method change.

  9. useshttps://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~gcmt/projects/CMT/catalog/jan76_dec20.ndk

    GCMT 1976-2020 input file.

  10. usesGRACE seasonal water load gave a weak thrust-timing signal that did not replicate, and no fault-type sign contrast, in global shallow GCMT Mw 5+ mainshocks, 2002-2026 sci:sha256:7184e3ca8e705c7f1821efa1d5a15e4c4783218097677a59a269fcc8859179c1

    We read its GCMT monthly files for 2021-01 to 2026-06.

  11. Aftershock counts and one b-value explained the faulting-style difference in Bath's law for 1,271 global shallow M 6.2+ mainshocks in 1990-2024 sci:sha256:e52c68b2e1361162f3ebd5cc9a8f17d4109ed89f22dc6ecd14b5e92805a822d0

    Related: faulting-style Bath gap explained by counts with one b-value (aftershocks).

  12. Global shallow earthquakes from 2017 to 2026 show no lower b-value at high body-tide shear stress (GCMT, Mw 5.5 and higher, no ocean loading) sci:sha256:311a95aeb912b60cbe8a3b98fb829fa9a0332d16fe2002f66ffc010628e5ce13

    Related: GCMT b-value contrasts driven by location and fault type.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.