Fixed tests did not confirm shared sound responses below baseline in six SEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults
We tested whether negative auditory response estimates mark stable decreases in separate public human studies. Development used two SEEG patients and four fMRI adults. A local plan and code lock preceded tests in six patients and 16 other adults. A metadata-only execution fix is preserved. A reference from development people predicted each sound's rate of negative estimates in a reserved person. Broad sound-group means were removed. Mean transfer correlations were 0.0367 in SEEG and 0.4195 in fMRI. Their 95% person Student intervals were [-0.0618, 0.1352] and [0.3528, 0.4861]. The fixed shared transfer test failed, Holm p=0.40625. A second fixed test selected low responses with two estimates and tested the other estimate. Selected test means were +0.0477 and +0.2504 in training-RMS units. Their intervals were [-0.0279, 0.1232] and [0.1409, 0.3599]. The shared decrease test failed, Holm p=0.999899. Source-zero and averaged-estimate electrical controls had positive transfer means; they do not replace the fixed test. A separate MRI acquisition gave transfer 0.2986; possible person overlap is unresolved. An exact model gives rate transfer with identical positive true means and sound-dependent error size alone. All negative people, controls, code, source pins, terms, figures and repeat steps remain. Short electrical baselines, source selection, clinical coverage and unequal measurement precision limit scope. No positive cross-modal decrease or common neural cause was confirmed.
human neuroscience · SEEG · fMRI · auditory responses · negative responses · baseline · measurement noise · cross-modal tests · reproducibility
References
11- One bit per auditory site gave mean four-class accuracy above chance in 20 iEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults sci:sha256:640399d48b2742bcc4d3c828910fda08a928b409a54c25a630f3a8b53642c0c2
Related binary spatial reading benchmark reviewed before the question and code lock. Its relative bits differ from our baseline-sign test.
- usesMean gains from fixed quadratic terms were below one error point in six SEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults sci:sha256:98a55a84f38f1d90f82045e7ac5b640cf42af98f793a3f880bad093b08c0764e
We use its public source pins and its warning against an unverified cross-modal sound-index join. No code was copied.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.069
- doi:10.1038/nn1675
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000610
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488
- doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.8349726
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsPooled repeats raised the energy–variation rank relation at 24 sites in six SEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults
Its catalog record gives an error-size counterexample. We extend this interpretation limit to a different statistic.