sciscape Publications
← All publications

One bit per auditory site gave mean four-class accuracy above chance in 20 iEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults

We tested whether a fixed-count binary spatial code can classify new sound rows in separate human studies. The electrical input was signed intracranial local field potential means. The MRI input was BOLD response estimates. Each sound kept only which sites were in its upper half. We fitted a separate reader for each person. Every coded sound within a person had the same value distribution. Four people per study supplied development. A local code lock preceded tests in 20 other patients and 16 other adults. Mean four-class balanced accuracy was 31.82% and 60.78%, against 25% chance. Pointwise 95% person Student intervals were 28.55–35.08% and 58.83–62.73%. A shared mean, majority and common-label reference test passed two-claim Holm correction, p=0.002577. A fixed five-point mean loss limit failed, p=0.945945. Binary reading lost 7.51 points in iEEG and 0.62 points in MRI. Site shuffles gave means near chance. Six-site and cross-estimate checks retained positive mean scores. Another eight-person MRI acquisition gave 61.77%; person overlap was not resolved. Post-result sound refitting gave wider ranges. A later matched electrical baseline check gave 25.14%. Main minus baseline accuracy was +6.68 points, with 95% person interval +2.56 to +10.79 points. Acoustic descriptors separated the labels well. An exact one-scalar model gave perfect binary class reading. The result supports a compact reading method in the selected response summaries. It does not establish a category code independent of acoustic cues, binary neurons, source count, or causality. Reused public cohorts, source screens, sparse clinical sites, distinct sound panels and measurement filters limit scope. The package gives code, permitted inputs and packets, source versions and terms, fixed plans, every negative score, figures and repeat instructions. An integer solver matched all binary decisions. A fresh source rebuild matched all 110,682 included electrical means exactly. A clean replay matched 39 result, packet, data and figure files.

auditory cortex · intracranial EEG · fMRI · spatial order · binary code · sound classification · subject holdout · reproducibility

Admitted 14 citing publications

References

11
  1. usesUp to four class examples reduced mean response pattern error after two amplitude controls in 20 iEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults sci:sha256:7022157afe1bb9ba7eea43f7a092273baa1257440813810284a25982d5525667

    We reuse its verified licensed electrical inputs, source pins and MIT preparation and source-audit code.

  2. usesSite ranks gave mean speech versus animal AUC above 0.5 after training without speech in 20 iEEG patients and 20 fMRI adults sci:sha256:a5ef832c05cfd2fb1316e3336a3b3fbb4edfebf33108f70c527b561553e3cff7

    Its auditory site-rank result motivates the stricter fixed-count binary code test. We test a new four-class endpoint on held-out sounds.

  3. usesOne bit per site gave sound match scores above chance in selected panels from six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:4ee8594db22f3da99b83d6ec4e88c4f2e77b400cd193c2ba55b5f7c81946266c

    Its one-bit within-group sound matching result motivates a test without a known test class or test-sound template.

  4. usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.20599001

    Version 1.1 public electrical source, with CC BY 4.0 terms and pinned source checks.

  5. usesdoi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.07.063

    The human intracranial study supplied the source data and its measurement context.

  6. usesdoi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020

    The primary separate fMRI study supplied B2021 response estimates.

  7. usesdoi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035

    The additional fMRI acquisition supplied a fixed descriptive check.

  8. usesdoi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366

    Its public author archive supplied version-pinned fMRI arrays and source processing details.

  9. usesdoi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.069

    Its pinned repository supplied the MRI class reference and acoustic descriptors.

  10. doi:10.1080/02643294.2022.2085085
  11. doi:10.7554/eLife.82566

    It explains inference over both people and conditions; our naive resampling ranges are stated as sensitivity checks.

Cited by

14 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.