Cross-pulse energy changed 10–90 ms response label AUC by less than 0.007 for the first five pulses in two SEEG recordings
We tested whether cross-pulse energy improves expert response-label ranking with the first five pulses. We used 630 public pulses, six SEEG readout contacts per recording, and 566 retained expert labels from OpenNeuro ds004774 v1.0.0. In the 10–90 ms window, mean-energy AUCs were 0.8880, 0.7385, and 0.8918. Cross-energy AUCs were 0.8910, 0.7411, and 0.8982. Paired 95% site bootstrap bounds included zero in all three expert groups. With two pulses, the correction reduced the UMCU25 point AUC by 0.0500; its paired bounds also included zero. The unscaled score removes independent trial-noise bias under a common mean and zero cross-pulse noise covariance. Shared noise and fixed artifact remain. The proof is for unscaled energy; the measured baseline divisor is random. This is retrospective label ranking in two recordings, not a live interface test. The package preserves exact epochs, source receipts, all scores and bootstrap values, figures, proof, code, and reproduction steps. All 630 fresh source ranges passed. Independent score and AUC checks passed, and a full numerical repeat was exact.
SEEG · evoked responses · cross-pulse energy · signal processing · response labels · AUC · noise correction
References
4- usesTen-pulse means had higher response label AUCs than first pulses for a fixed 10–90 ms absolute score in two SEEG recordings sci:sha256:1dfa7a52fe9acf5f4a7a85e2004bf3a19d22575d694466d89d391e4150e0d226
We used this publication's exact native epochs, source labels, event selection, source manifests, and retrieval code. We adapted its paired site bootstrap method. Independent calculations also reproduced all 36 prior peak AUC values for the full cohort.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004774.v1.0.0
OpenNeuro ds004774 v1.0.0 supplies the source epochs, metadata, and expert annotations.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110389
The study uses the source dataset context and response-label definition described by this publication.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005508
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesProducts of different pulses changed 24 of 54 SEEG pair choices and gave mixed gains across recorded currents with five selection pulses in three patients at 20 to 500 ms
Its comparison of squared mean voltage and products of different pulses informed the selection comparison. We used a different dataset and a separate-pulse transfer endpoint, without expert labels.