sciscape Publications
← All publications

The mean flight-date gap showed no clear change among nine butterflies at 84 UK sites between 1980–1999 and 2005–2024

We tested whether summer butterfly species flew closer together in time at the same sites. We used the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme 2024 release. We compared 1980–1999 with 2005–2024. The sample had 16,524 annual paired records from 525 site-pair units, 25 species pairs, nine species and 84 sites. Each unit had at least ten shared years in each period. Each species had a peak count of at least five in the selected years. We gave each species pair equal weight. The mean absolute gap between recorded mean flight dates rose from 14.51 to 15.26 days. The change was +0.75 days, with a 95% resampling interval of −0.44 to +1.88 days. The mean date of each pair moved 4.57 days earlier, with an interval of −7.18 to −2.15 days. The uncertainty calculation kept common calendar-year variation across sites. An areas-only calculation gave a narrower gap interval that excluded zero. Checks with larger counts and more years did not show a clear mean gap change. This sample mainly represents persistent local pairs in England. It does not measure full flight overlap or the cause of timing changes. The package has exact source data, code, selection records, saved draws, figures and independent arithmetic checks.

butterfly · phenology · seasonal timing · paired comparison · shared year variation · open biodiversity data

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

5
  1. usesdoi:10.5285/b9d237fc-5a79-4449-bcee-34c52d87608f

    This release supplies the annual butterfly mean flight dates and peak counts.

  2. usesdoi:10.5285/d7256b49-f2e3-4ae7-907d-af729610c768

    This release supplies survey type, site location and country.

  3. usesA larger abundance index was linked to a larger gap between first and mean flight dates in 13 UK summer butterflies in 1976–2024 sci:sha256:6afb950974e76cbb1c299ca449e8080efa371b077af2ab9443b4e92000d7e370

    We used its group of 13 summer species and its retained source packages. We read its verified main text. We did not use its fitted results.

  4. doi:10.1111/gcb.12920
  5. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00020.x

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.