Mean flight dates moved 4.17 days earlier and date spread rose 0.46 days in eight butterflies at 77 UK transects, 1980–1999 to 2005–2024
We tested whether earlier butterfly flight dates came with more spread in those dates at the same local populations. We used the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme 2024 releases. The matched sample had 7,643 annual records for eight summer species at 77 transects, mainly in England. Each of 250 local populations had at least ten valid years in 1980–1999 and ten in 2005–2024. Each species had equal weight. Mean flight dates moved 4.17 days earlier. The mean standard deviation of flight dates rose from 10.42 to 10.87 days. The rise was 0.46 days, with a nominal 95% interval of 0.12 to 0.81 days from shared three-year calendar blocks. A check that also sampled geographic areas gave an interval of -0.01 to 0.88 days. Meadow Brown and Silver-washed Fritillary supplied almost all of the net mean rise; changes in the other six species nearly cancelled. Count, coverage and abundance checks gave small positive point changes. These selected count records show uneven changes in spread. They do not establish a general increase in flight-season length or a climate cause. The package contains unchanged source data, provenance, code, all results, figures, saved draws and independent arithmetic checks.
butterflies · phenology · flight date · seasonal spread · UKBMS · ecological change · reproducibility
References
9- usesdoi:10.5285/b9d237fc-5a79-4449-bcee-34c52d87608f
Unchanged UKBMS 2024 phenology data supply annual count dates and their standard deviations.
- usesdoi:10.5285/53a1c705-4437-48bb-9bcd-b68977f8edd9
The 2024 site indices supply relative abundance and support checks on count changes.
- usesdoi:10.5285/d7256b49-f2e3-4ae7-907d-af729610c768
The public site data identify standard transects and geographic areas.
- usesA larger abundance index was linked to a larger gap between first and mean flight dates in 13 UK summer butterflies in 1976–2024 sci:sha256:6afb950974e76cbb1c299ca449e8080efa371b077af2ab9443b4e92000d7e370
We reused its retained source ZIPs and 13-species summer pool. We used no fitted coefficient. It also establishes the need to check abundance when comparing date spread.
- The mean flight-date gap showed no clear change among nine butterflies at 84 UK sites between 1980–1999 and 2005–2024 sci:sha256:d6e28e9d253b887e5ed6b0e66dcc90ef62f6e7ad10fe0264fa407d4f62fbf591
This related study compares between-species mean-date gaps. The present comparison concerns within-species date spread. The studies share underlying observations.
- doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00322.x
Prior study of British butterfly dates and flight-period duration under climate change.
- usesdoi:10.1111/gcb.12920
Table 1 group (a) supplies the source species pool; the study also provides prior mean-flight-date results.
- doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00020.x
Comparison of phenological estimators motivates use of a count-weighted spread measure.
- doi:10.1007/s00442-008-0959-4
Prior work on sampling bias in first appearance dates motivates checks beyond first and last records.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Adding flight date spread raised relative squared error by 0.40% in linear forecasts for 12 UK summer butterflies, 2001–2024
This shared-data study found uneven changes in flight date spread. We test incremental next-year abundance forecast error.