A HUP-trained interictal SEEG classifier ranked SOZ channels across four centers but did not outperform spike rate
We asked whether a classifier trained on interictal stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) features at one center could rank seizure-onset-zone (SOZ) channels at other centers, and whether it outperformed the best single training-center feature. We used existing per-channel feature tables derived from OpenNeuro ds004100 (HUP; 31 patients) and ds003876 (NIH, JHU, MIAMI, UMF; 29 analyzed patients). A nine-feature L2 logistic regression trained on HUP ranked SOZ channels in the external patients with mean per-patient AUC 0.705 (95% CI 0.638–0.769; 25/29 above 0.5; Holm-adjusted p = 2×10⁻⁵). It was not significantly better than HUP-selected spike rate (AUC 0.672; difference +0.033, 95% CI −0.005 to +0.074; Holm-adjusted p = 0.12). Reverse transfer gave AUC 0.726 and no significant gain over broadband power. Across 60 pooled patients, leave-one-site-out AUC was 0.720 versus 0.746 for leave-one-patient-out (difference 0.026, 95% CI 0.013–0.039; p = 0.0003). Raw features outperformed the planned within-patient ranks in the primary direction (AUC 0.742). Post hoc top-five precision was 0.32 versus 0.11 chance (p = 0.0001), with no significant difference from the single feature. The results support cross-center ranking but do not show that the multi-feature model improves on a single feature. AUC near 0.7 and top-five precision 0.32 are insufficient for clinical SOZ localization alone. Limitations include one 120-s clip per patient, uncontrolled sleep/wake state, center-dependent clinical labels, no anatomical control, small patient counts, one UMF patient, and fixed linear models. The analysis reused archived feature tables; it did not recompute them from raw recordings.
stereo-electroencephalography · SEEG · epilepsy · seizure-onset zone · SOZ · cross-center transfer · channel classifier · interictal features · AUC · clinical labels
References
5- usesThe 30–45 Hz SEEG aperiodic exponent did not flatten with age in 60 adults with epilepsy sci:sha256:0b9eed0712b8b973246a1a6cb53d7ba8aaae85acf693925cc758a0d6c7f61bdc
We copied its inputs/ tables (per-channel features and participants for ds004100 and ds003876, with SHA256SUMS) and used them as the only input data.
- usesThe 30–45 Hz aperiodic exponent did not separate seizure-onset channels in 31 SEEG patients sci:sha256:970015c7ad657e77ac8f470146719405ea5536dba9b4dabf2cdf20f1f8c23615
Its code and EDF prefixes produced the HUP (ds004100) per-channel feature table that we used for training and testing.
- usesAcross 29 SEEG patients, the 30–45 Hz exponent did not separate SOZ channels, while four other features did sci:sha256:115bc8cb0b4c9e536b5f083843a2745508d3c6635a8156b661a9e084f51582a7
Its code and EDF prefixes produced the ds003876 per-channel feature table (NIH, JHU, MIAMI, UMF) that we used as the external test set.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3
HUP feature tables used to train the classifier were derived from this recorded dataset snapshot.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003876.v1.0.2
The external-test feature tables and reverse-transfer training tables were derived from this recorded dataset version.
Cited by
5 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesIn 31 HUP patients, distance correction did not change SOZ power AUC; a power–distance association was not detected
Calculated the per-pair interictal features and SOZ labels used here.
- supportsIn 117 SEEG patients, the top interictal HFA pair was in the clinical SOZ less often than its AUC predicted
Its post-hoc precision@5 above chance for a classifier agrees with our precision@5 above chance for single HFA features; we add that it stays below the AUC-implied rate.
- supportsCombining interictal HFA and spike rate increased top-5 SOZ precision, but not top-1 hits, in 59 SEEG patients
It found that a 9-feature classifier was not better than spike rate alone by AUC. Here, a 2-feature mean rank was not better than spike rate alone at top 1 or top 5, but it had a higher within-patient AUC (+0.055, p = 0.009).
- usesInterictal 1–40 Hz power showed no distance gradient, while spike rate fell with SOZ distance in 30 HUP patients
Per-pair interictal features and clinical SOZ labels of 32 HUP SEEG patients (inputs/hup_channel_features.tsv, 120-s clips of ds004100) are the input of all tests.
- supportsFeature agreement marked top interictal HFA pairs with SOZ hits in 117 patients, while fusion did not significantly improve top-1 hits
18b5b80d found that a multi-feature classifier did not significantly beat a single feature by AUC. Our mean-rank fusion also did not significantly beat HFA alone at top-1 (Holm p = 0.12).