sciscape Publications
← All publications

Offline response noise allocation had an uncertain 20 to 500 ms centered bipolar SEEG forecast gain at three pulses per site in eight recordings

We tested how to assign a fixed calibration pulse budget for stimulation response forecasts. The public SEEG data came from OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1. The test used eight recordings from eight people, 85 stimulation sites, and 879 site-to-readout pairs. Noise in the first two responses set the response rule. Noise before the same pulses set the control rule. Each rule used 255 early calibration pulses, with two to five per site. The final five pulses at each site gave 425 separate test targets. The mean reduction in normalized 20 to 500 ms waveform error was 3.30%. The descriptive 95% person-bootstrap interval was -0.42% to 6.94%. The two-sided sign-flip value was 0.141. Thus, the practical forecast gain remains uncertain. Early response noise was associated with later variance across sites. The mean rank correlation was 0.465 with the main scale and 0.380 without an energy divisor. The raw scale check was added after the planned results. Exact controls separate the count pattern from its assignment to sites. The package keeps compact trial products, four figures, pinned public-source hashes, validation results, and result tables. GPL analysis and extraction code is omitted, so the exact implementation cannot be rerun from this package. The data and test targets were used in prior studies. This is an exploratory offline reuse. It does not establish pulse savings or live brain-computer interface performance. Fresh rebuilds of all eight public source files matched every saved Gram matrix and source table. All 44 public metadata hashes also matched.

stereoelectroencephalography · electrical stimulation · response noise · pulse allocation · forecast error · brain-computer interface

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

5
  1. usesLarger response energy was linked to greater later variance relative to baseline in 20–500 ms centered bipolar SEEG from eight patients sci:sha256:7ef88a69476e0bd9854c540baecac51983585ede1a7e286d2f771f58df9221b3

    Its association between early response energy and later response variance informed the question. The present study uses noise from two pulses to assign a fixed budget and compares it directly with pre-pulse noise.

  2. usesAt rate 1, learned weights reduced 20 to 500 ms SEEG forecast error against equal weights but raised error against scaled means in eight recordings sci:sha256:ef0c0959114fb72eaef63b2306de27883d737af4882e1642fc43cc265cd97c7b

    We used the GPL retrieval helpers and source-audit structure that the direct data parent copied from this work. These files support the pinned public-source rebuild and the event-to-trial mapping.

  3. usesA flexible calibration rule reduced 20 to 500 ms SEEG forecast error against concentrated calibration at the same budget in eight recordings sci:sha256:b11e64a72d90d5d9472330f22107d3989f0a6dcd64b08dca4eef577da0e4478b

    We used its compact all-pulse Gram products, native voltage examples, source provenance, and retrieval helpers. This study changes the question, common scale, comparator, and main budget. It tests response noise against pre-pulse noise at three pulses per site.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1

    The study used public processed trial data from OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1.

  5. supportsdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023

    The source paper describes acquisition and preprocessing of the public SEEG recordings used here.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.