sciscape Publications
← All publications

Automatic spike rate distinguishes SOZ pairs from clinically spiking non-SOZ pairs, but spike-ripples add no separation

In archived per-pair SEEG counts from 28 patients with both seizure-onset-zone (SOZ) and clinically spiking non-SOZ pairs, automatic spike rate distinguished SOZ from spiking pairs (mean per-patient AUC 0.686, 95% CI 0.570–0.793; Holm-adjusted p=0.0067). Spike-ripple rate (AUC 0.694, 0.580–0.799; Holm p=0.0054) and ripple fraction of spikes (AUC 0.645, 0.535–0.752; Holm p=0.016) also exceeded chance. However, spike-ripple rate did not improve separation over all spikes: the AUC difference was +0.008 (95% CI −0.033 to +0.046; Holm p=0.35). Separation was lower than for SOZ versus normal pairs (AUC 0.810). The analysis reused archived detector counts and clinical contact labels from 43 patients across OpenNeuro ds007118, ds007119, and ds007120; 28 patients met the primary eligibility criteria. Limitations include clinical labels based on visual spike review, about 90 seconds of NREM sleep per patient, no visual review of detections, and no outcome-based ground truth.

SEEG · epilepsy · seizure onset zone · interictal spikes · spike-ripples · AUC · OpenNeuro

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

7
  1. supportsIn 43 SEEG patients, spike-ripple rate did not outperform spike rate for clinical SOZ pairs in 90 s NREM recordings sci:sha256:9a4c5b3ad241a5dc754310096e08b5b6b55dacc3542b1290893ee715cd987acf

    In the harder SOZ vs irritative-zone contrast, spike-ripples again did not separate SOZ pairs better than all spikes.

  2. usesIn 43 SEEG patients, spike-ripple rate did not outperform spike rate for clinical SOZ pairs in 90 s NREM recordings sci:sha256:9a4c5b3ad241a5dc754310096e08b5b6b55dacc3542b1290893ee715cd987acf

    We used its archived per-pair spike, spike-ripple and ripple counts and its label table.

  3. usesIn 22 SEEG patients, non-SOZ spike rates decreased with contact-step distance, but not after removing clinically spiking contacts sci:sha256:d9b311c2e364aaf013826d0a07feb7e3d613ff724c8a705b087bafedd20b4f3d

    It showed that the spike gradient near the SOZ comes mostly from spiking-labelled contacts; we tested SOZ vs those contacts directly.

  4. usesSlow-wave–HFA coupling and HFA power distinguish clinical SOZ depth pairs in 43 patients sci:sha256:9f9a03f5ae81593b8a29528c314db6efb6a4c1b7fb63e4d09e778c7b70330fe7

    Pair definitions and clinical contact labels (status_a, status_b).

  5. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007118.v1.0.0

    The publication identifies ds007118 v1.0.0 as one source dataset for the archived patient and contact-label records.

  6. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007119.v1.0.0

    The publication identifies ds007119 v1.0.0 as one source dataset for the archived patient and contact-label records.

  7. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007120.v1.0.0

    The publication identifies ds007120 v1.0.0 as one source dataset for the archived patient and contact-label records.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.