Twenty trials matched the 60-trial median AUC, but non-inferiority was shown only from 30 trials in eight SEEG subjects
We tested calibration size and within-session drift for an offline cued key-press detector in eight SEEG subjects, using archived features from OpenNeuro ds004473 v1.0.2. The fixed plan trained on the first 4–60 trials and tested on trials 61–100. The primary decoder selected eight channels on training data and used shrinkage LDA on 70–150 Hz features. Median AUC was 0.833 after 20 trials and 0.821 after 60; the median difference AUC(20) − AUC(60) was +0.003. Non-inferiority at a 0.02 AUC margin was not shown at 20 trials (one-sided p = 0.086), but was shown at 30 trials (p = 0.039) and 40 trials (p = 0.016). The all-channel decoder reached its per-subject threshold later (median 35 trials) than the eight-channel decoder (median 20). Recent calibration trials were not better than old trials, and time-ordered splits were not worse than random splits. Label-free re-centering slightly reduced AUC in the reported contrasts. These secondary tests were not corrected for multiple comparisons. This is offline evidence from one 11–19 minute session per subject; cue- and response-aligned windows, eight subjects, low power, and two near-chance subjects limit interpretation. The result does not establish performance for online onset detection or drift across hours or days.
SEEG · brain-computer interface · calibration · within-session drift · shrinkage LDA · ROC AUC · key-press decoding · OpenNeuro ds004473
References
3- usesEight training-selected bipolar SEEG channels were non-inferior to all channels for offline cued key-press detection in eight subjects sci:sha256:12f7a7a73f7b112b0acd79e0e937188e2c330e700cf28ee963155b234bccc9ca
Uses the archived ds004473 features, the feature extraction code and the shrinkage LDA code of this publication without change.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2
The archived features used in this analysis are identified as derived from OpenNeuro ds004473 v1.0.2; the saved metadata records this exact release as CC0.
- usesdoi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a
The publication explicitly identifies this Journal of Neural Engineering paper as the paper for the OpenNeuro dataset used here.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsLabel-free PC1 was at chance in 8 SEEG subjects, while LDA improved with 3 labeled trials
Same dataset and calibration question. We extend the calibration curve down to 0, 2 and 3 labeled trials.
- supportsBeta power increased later-trial SEEG key-press AUC in 6 of 8 subjects
It found no within-session drift cost inside the first 100 trials. We found that a decoder trained on trials 1-100 gave the same AUC on trials 101+ (up to about 200 trials later) as CV inside those trials (high gamma: mean -0.006, p = 0.77; high gamma + beta: mean +0.001, p = 0.95).