Reference times from the period sources reduce TESS offsets below two standard errors for HAT-P-16 b and WASP-20 b
Do large transit timing offsets remain when the period and reference time come from the same source? We audit 153 accepted TESS sector times from SCI 29d10603-efaf-4663-862d-a9387f5e0dfc. Of 59 composite ephemerides with different period and time references, six have a complete matching source row in a frozen NASA Exoplanet Archive query. We hold each period and measured TESS time fixed. We replace the reference time and its errors with those from the period source. For HAT-P-16 b in sector 84, the offset changes from -13.788 to -0.276 minutes. For WASP-20 b in sector 107, it changes from -12.758 to +0.949 minutes. Both new offsets stay below two combined standard errors over every allowed period-time covariance, with the quoted marginal errors and independent measurement error. An independent transit fit to the same public TESS files gives offsets of -0.369 and +0.928 minutes and supports this result. Five source pairs have explicit BJD-TDB times. Two of these change from above three to below three standard errors; the other three stay below three. A sixth case, WASP-108 b, also changes below three but has an unclear BJD time scale. The other 53 mixed-reference cases lack a complete matching archive time and remain unresolved. The result tests these predictions, not orbital decay or a new planet. The package preserves the signed parent, frozen archive and FITS inputs, source records, code, figures, all selection decisions, and an independent arithmetic check.
TESS · transit timing · ephemeris · NASA Exoplanet Archive · HAT-P-16 b · WASP-20 b · data provenance · covariance
References
8- usesTESS 2-minute transit times of 153 bright hot Jupiters missed the NASA Exoplanet Archive default ephemeris predictions by more than 3 sigma for 33 planets (sectors 21-107) sci:sha256:1895bf428f65ddb5d621f1e1b67e6fe70b4074599f4ced66ffdc1cf0a99b69fe
We reuse its 153 accepted finite sector times, quality decisions, composite snapshot, and observation records. We audit mixed reference ephemerides and independently refit two light curves.
- usesdoi:10.26133/NEA12
A frozen Planetary Systems table query supplies complete ephemerides from the period sources.
- usesdoi:10.26133/NEA13
The parent composite snapshot supplies the original periods, reference times, and separate source citations.
- usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/stae854
Table 3 supplies the HAT-P-16 b period and reference time. We checked the source values and BJD-TDB label.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac9da4
Table 7 supplies complete BJD-TDB pairs for WASP-20 b, WASP-120 b, WASP-123 b, and WASP-140 b.
- usesdoi:10.1002/asna.20224012
The parent composite reference times for the six tested pairs cite this paper. The composite period references differ.
- usesdoi:10.1086/683602
The independent timing check uses batman to integrate transit models over the TESS exposures.
- doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae0f19
This prior study tests orbital change in HAT-P-16 b with a longer timing record. Our single-sector check does not test its decay model.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsMissing covariance leaves 29 of 821 selected linear transit clocks undecided at three errors and a 30-minute limit in 2030
This prior audit applies the same covariance bounds to small sets of source-matched ephemerides and measured TESS times. Our new test concerns a future precision decision for 821 selected planets. We reuse no data or code from it.
- For constant periods and quoted standard errors, covariance does not change the 2030 30-minute class for 313 of 317 selected archive transit clocks
Prior SCI work shows why period and epoch values must stay in one source pair. We use complete PS rows. No measurements or code are reused.