A fixed pre-pulse adjustment gave 70.8% accuracy versus 71.4% without adjustment for neighboring sites at 20–100 ms in five offline SEEG sessions
We tested a fixed pre-pulse adjustment on public SEEG data from five patients with epilepsy. The offline task contained 122 two-site problems. Neighboring sites shared one stimulation contact. Each site supplied four calibration pulses and four separate test pulses. With a 20 to 100 ms response, equal-patient mean accuracy was 70.82% with adjustment and 71.44% without it. The change was -0.62 percentage points. Its descriptive patient bootstrap interval was -1.45 to +0.21 points. An exact patient sign-flip calculation gave p = 0.3125 under independent, sign-symmetric patient contrasts. The later window gave a small gain with large uncertainty. Wrong-pulse pre voltage gave a similar main score. Calibration error fell, but test voltage error rose in four patients in an exploratory check. All 110 pinned source files passed hash checks. Fresh raw extraction and analysis replay matched the saved data and results. The package includes code, source bins, full predictions, three figures, and reproduction instructions. The site schedule confounds this split. The result does not establish a causal brain-state effect or live BCI performance.
stereoelectroencephalography · brain-computer interface · site identification · pre-pulse voltage · conditional response model
References
8- usesA fixed covariance rule gave higher SEEG site accuracy than a diagonal rule in offline tests from five patient sessions sci:sha256:1407cd9ac712a4bcd551a3738cc90c3fab309b871572cbd6fc644b41555f7886
We used its fixed half-diagonal covariance rule for the response and joint models.
- usesPulse time alone gave 74.8% mean site accuracy in five offline SEEG tests with shared calibration and test blocks sci:sha256:07f3c9173d8e02cafb724475eb4d7d43bb6e6bf6e042867f73744b4ea8895b75
We used its recording-time control to explain the schedule limit. We did not transfer its numeric scores to our two-site test.
- usesA relative distance score gave higher mean AUROC but accepted most SEEG responses from withheld shafts in five offline sessions sci:sha256:e20e4bb067514e9b579810b8a02215225203afff58108a2c2ada8ec7689b98d1
We used its pinned raw-source retrieval and extraction recipe, through the immediate parent package.
- usesFour-pulse means increased mean neighboring site accuracy before and after stimulation in five offline SEEG sessions with fixed calibration sci:sha256:5f68aed0188291b0fe7510a89f6019e0fb50c98f39dee42080446d527d54c0ec
We used its voltage bins, contact choices, and extraction code. We checked our response baseline against its saved models.
- usesA fixed pre-pulse voltage model had a mean 3.8% error increase at later sites in five SEEG sessions sci:sha256:75c9b7d9135d45ecf7f9a8eb06ff6798fe1e048c1713980e8ef4f61e237bf529
We read its pre-pulse response-size forecast results after our primary scores. We used them to explain the different scope of our waveform test.
- usesSEEG data after a pulse gave higher site accuracy than data before a pulse for neighboring stimulation pairs in five offline sessions sci:sha256:cc9cff014ad9a1de9fea11bb8c1c8abd0959876f505ec02183487d49597fd95d
We used its neighboring-site task and site selection rules for the paired comparison.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004457.v1.0.2
Source dataset for the five SEEG sessions; the recorded version is 1.0.2 and its saved metadata give CC0 terms.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1325-22.2023
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.